hi
June 2019 may witness some major quakes (7.5+) for the following reasons
Some of the major planets and sun are at 22+ declination like... Sun,Mars,Mercury,Jupiter, Saturn and even Pluto
Some of the probable dates for major quakes(6.3+) are as follows
1)4th June 2019.................7.1
2)9th June.........................6.7
3)17th June ......................6.6
4)26th June.......................6.7
window period is + or - one day
Amit
June 2019 may witness some major quakes (7.5+) for the following reasons
Some of the major planets and sun are at 22+ declination like... Sun,Mars,Mercury,Jupiter, Saturn and even Pluto
Some of the probable dates for major quakes(6.3+) are as follows
1)4th June 2019.................7.1
2)9th June.........................6.7
3)17th June ......................6.6
4)26th June.......................6.7
window period is + or - one day
Amit
I like it when people come together and share opinions.
ReplyDeleteGreat blog, continue the good work!
You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but
ReplyDeleteI find this topic to be actually something which I think I would never understand.
It seems too complex and extremely broad for me.
I am looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!
Hi
ReplyDeleteA 6.3 quake today ie 4th June 2019,at Izu island ,Japan Region.
A date hit prediction
Watch out series of hit predictions
Are these all just by chance or fluke?
I still believe ,one more major (6.5+) quake to come in this window period
Amit
Hi
ReplyDeleteA 6.3 Earthquake reported at Japan region to day ie 4th June 2019
A date hit prediction
Are these prediction just by chance or fluke?
You decide
Amit
Hi
ReplyDeleteIn fact, I believe ,there is yet one more 6.5+ quake to come by tomorrow
Place /location not known
Amit
Good work
ReplyDeleteAmit;
ReplyDeleteLet me explain why your theory doesn't work.
A quake happens when a fault has accumulated enough energy to overcome the forces keeping it from happening.
When that happens coincident with your window you claim a hit.
But it takes a long time to recharge for the next quake and during that time your windows keep opening, causing a series of misses.
Also the quake may happen when no window is open, another miss.
It adds up to more misses than hits so you score below chance.
Roger
Roger
ReplyDeleteThere are various points to be clarified
1) It is not true. After and even before major quake, aftershock and pre shock occurs at the same place ,which are often equal to major quake.
My cycle quake theory says, for a major quake of ,7.5+ there occurs pre shocks and aftershocks at intervals
12 hrs, 24 hrs, 7-8th day, 14th- 15th day. These intervals relates to Moon movement
2) There are major quakes at places not on plate boundaries , there is no explanation for this
Every hit prediction can not be by chance or fluke
Amit
Amit;
ReplyDelete1) Can you show me an example of that? 2 quakes of equal mag and location.
Your cycle theory is simply wrong. The moon has nothing to do with quakes.
If it did, you would not have failed my long term test.
2) There are quakes not on plate boundaries but we do know why. Subduction zones for example.
Quakes related to volcanos for another.
Yes, your hits are due to chance. Otherwise you would not have failed my test.
Roger
Roger
ReplyDeleteOK, As you wish
1)As per plate tectonic theory, 7.5+ quake can occur at same location only after stresses built up again ,may be 50 years , 100 years > you specify
now look at the following quakes
a)7.9 at 10.51 UTC,at 4.5 south and 153.2 East, on 17th December 2016...PNG
b) 7.9 at 4.30 UTC, at 6.24 South and 155.17 East on 22nd January 2017....PNG
c)7.5 at 13.28 UTC at 6.7 south and 155 East on 19th April 2014....PNG
d)7.5 at 1.44 UTC at 5.46 South and 151.8 East on 5th May 2015.....PNG
OK next question
E)7.5 at 12.58 UTC at 4.08 South and 152.56 East on 14th May 2019...PNG
Do you think 7.5+ quake equivalent stress can be accumulated in one month ?
How do you explain all these with plate tectonics ?
Ok next question
Look at the following quake
7.7 at Gujarat , India ( 23.4 North and 70.2 East) on 26th January 2001 at 3.16 UTC
Do you think there is volcano here
or plate boundary
or Subduction Zone
How do you explain this 7.7 major quake
SO , think out of the box
Old theories are not necessarily correct especially when it says ,it is unable to predict major quakes
Amit
Hi two major quakes 6.1 ,and 7.5 on 15th after 22 hrs UTC.
ReplyDeleteI am aware ,these are one and half hour earlier than window period.
But think of time 2 hrs and 200 yrs which seismologist predict
Amit
Hi
ReplyDeleteThis is a hit 7.5 quake prediction for NZ. I would like opinion of NZ people ,as to whether this could be just a fluke? or just by chance
More and extensive ,study can even predict location prediction
Amit
Hi
ReplyDeleteYet another hit
6.3 at karmadic island today ie 16th June
Amit
Hi
ReplyDeleteOne more 6 quake at NZ today
A date hit prediction
Amit
Hi
ReplyDeleteOne more hit prediction
6.4 quake at Japan today ie 18th June 2019
How may hit prediction windows are required to make a point
Amit
https://m.businesstoday.in/story/china-earthquake-6-magnitude-11-dead-122-injured/1/356965.html
ReplyDeleteHi
ReplyDeleteLook here
One more hit prediction
A 6.3 quake at Russia on 25th June 2019
How many hits are required to prove a point?
Amit
Hi
ReplyDeleteA date hit production
A 6.4 at Panama today
Amit
Amit;
ReplyDeleteLet's see how you did last month (June)
There were 17 suitable quakes and 8 were in your windows.
You had 4 windows (12 days) so the chances of a hit were 12/30.
That's about chance level.
3/4 windows had 1 or more quakes so you did better than expected
in that respect.
Still just chance.
Roger