Roger
I think , the way you have put forward is not correct
If you say, my results are 50% ie 2 hits out of 4 in a month, it is mandatory for you to get 3 hits out of 4 in the months. Therefore the number of persons getting three or more hit in months should be taken
Your results are
A) September
nil hit.......0
1 hit...6
2hit.....12
3 hit ....10
4 hits ...2
B) October...
nil....6
1.....17
2.....7
3.....nil
4....nil
C) November
nil..0
1...0
2...1
3 hit...12
4 hit...17
D) December
nil hit...2
1....14
2....8
3hit..6
4....nil
E) January 2015
nil hit...3
1....20.
2hit...7
3hit...nil
4 hit...nil
Thus ,you have 3 or 4 hits total 47
This is out of 30 persons for five months ie 150
Now 47/150 =31.3 %
For ,you proving better than me ,you should only take in account three or four hits by a person ( total 30 fictitious persons)
Amit
I think , the way you have put forward is not correct
If you say, my results are 50% ie 2 hits out of 4 in a month, it is mandatory for you to get 3 hits out of 4 in the months. Therefore the number of persons getting three or more hit in months should be taken
Your results are
A) September
nil hit.......0
1 hit...6
2hit.....12
3 hit ....10
4 hits ...2
B) October...
nil....6
1.....17
2.....7
3.....nil
4....nil
C) November
nil..0
1...0
2...1
3 hit...12
4 hit...17
D) December
nil hit...2
1....14
2....8
3hit..6
4....nil
E) January 2015
nil hit...3
1....20.
2hit...7
3hit...nil
4 hit...nil
Thus ,you have 3 or 4 hits total 47
This is out of 30 persons for five months ie 150
Now 47/150 =31.3 %
For ,you proving better than me ,you should only take in account three or four hits by a person ( total 30 fictitious persons)
Amit