The deep mountains and plate tectonics

 

Here is the point
Mountains are not entirely due to plate tectonics.
Deeper forces are responsible for lifting them
we have seen that ,there are huge mountains (3 tines bigger than Himalayas) deep below the Earth.
  Now where is plate tectonics at Earth core level.
  The reason given by plate tectonics is not correct. Merely saying that....
....these deep mountains are remains of subduction plate which goes in to the menle..How the subduction plate remain solid at Earth core level?
   The correct explanation is...
...Deep mountains are formed by bulging of solid menle due to tidal thrust below it.
    The same is now admitted here in this article also
so,wake up
plate tectonics is not the solution for all the Seismic problems
Think Out of Box

https://www.sciencealert.com/the-origins-of-mountains-could-lie-much-deeper-in-earth-than-we-thought

Straight line theory fo Major (6+) Earthquake prediction (modified)

 A straight line theory for major (6+) quakes

we have seen some of the major quakes occurring on Full Moon or New Moon day

But it is not always correct

If so ,all major quakes should occur on FM and NM days.

 What I believe is other than above following plays major role

1) Proximity (closer) of Juoiter 'Venus,and Mars are also to be counted

2) One additional thing ,I have learnt over years is a configuration of planets in Straight line .when..

above planets are closer/changing direction from Direct to retrogate or retrogate to direct and in a straight line ,when Earth is also in that line...those prone weeks

  On such prone weeks ,when fast moving Moon joins the line ( one of these configuration is Full Moon,New Moon or even Eclipses) major quakes occur

 Jupiter is the key member of this straight line.One special attribute Jupiter have is...it is equally potent at 120 degree when compared to straight line. Say if Venus is closer(0.3 to 0.4 AU) and Jupiter is at 120 to Venus ,it is potent,if Moon Joins straight line

So ,now What I have concluded is other than Gravitation pull(Closeness..which is first requirement) a straight line configuration of more than 3 planets is required. 

One of these straight line of of course our Full Moon and New Moon

 So ,Major quakes can also occur on dates when Such straight line configuration occurs(other than Full Moon and New Moon)when 3 or more planes are in straight line ( one or two closer and changing direction).Jupiter ,Saturn ,Venus and Mars plays major role when closer and in line with Earth (and Moon)

  Please check yesterday's Japan quake (6.2...which was not predicted..)with my epicenter theory and know for yourself

Straight line theory for major earthquakes (6+) to occur

 straight line theory for major (6+) quakes

we have seen some of the major quakes occurring on Full Moon or New Moon day

But it is not always correct

If so ,all major quakes should occur on FM and NM days.

 What I believe is other than above following plays major role

1) Proximity (closer) of Jupiter 'Venus,and Mars are also to be counted

2) One additional thing ,I have learnt over years is a configuration of planets in Straight line .when..

above planets are closer/changing direction from Direct to retrogate or retrogate to direct and in a straight line ,when Earth is also in that line...those are prone weeks.

  On such prone weeks ,when fast moving Moon joins the line ( one of these configuration is Full Moon,New Moon or even Eclipses) major quakes occur

 Jupiter is the key member of this straight line.

So ,now What I have concluded is other than Gravitation pull(Closeness..which is first requirement) a straight line configuration of more than 3 planets is required. 

One of these straight line of of course our Full Moon and New Moon

 So ,Major quakes can also occur on dates when Such straight line configuration occurs(other than Full Moon and New Moon)when 3 or more planets are in straight line ( one or two closer and changing direction).Jupiter ,Saturn ,Venus and Mars plays major role when closer /changing directions and in line with Earth (and Moon)

  Please check yesterday's Japan quake (6.2...which was not predicted..)with my epicenter theory and know for yourself

Checking last 100 major quakes for epicenter hypothesis

 

I have completed the testing of 100 major (6+) quakes epicenter location hypothesis
Earlier 65 quakes were tested out if which 56 were as per hypothesis and 9 were not following
Now in remaining 35 quakes ,30 are as per hypothesis and 5 apparently not following ( which is yet to be stdied)
So in all out of 100 major quakes from Sept 22 till 10th June 23, total 86 quakes follow the norms
So accuracy is 86%

Checking my epicenter location hypothesis...Results

 

One of my friend have asked me test my location hypothesis for latest 100 major quakes (6+) myself
  Today I have checked all 65 major quakes of 6+ from 1st January 2023 against my epicenter location hypothesis .
The detailed list with each result will be published soon.
  However,the gist of outcome /result is as follows

Out of 65 major (6+) quakes...
56 quakes follow the hypothesis
9 are not following Sun /Moon...Zenith/Nadir and rising/setting norms
The detailed result will show ,which other major planets those 9 quakes are following   and why
So percentage accuracy is..86%

Earthquake and Eruptions

 https://lnkd.in/dnxyWBfi

on 7th June 2023 ,the volcanic eruption started.

 Ad per hypothesis if on a predicted date ,there is a fresh volcainc eruption or major hike in continuing volcanic eruption,the magnitude of quake may be less.

This is because the built up tidal pressure is partially released by eruption 

Gondwana was the first and last supercontinent .

 Few questions to plate tectonics on the idea of multiple supercontinents prior to Gondvana

There are few questions to plate tectonics

1) where are these earlier plate boundaries,prior to Gondavana super continent ,?

2) Are they merged ?

3) What forces broke and moved these plates?

Are those heat currents?

If heat currents were present at that place , it would not allow plates to solidify there,in first place

What I believe is...

There was only ,first and last super continent ie Gondvana.

 It broke in to pieces due to violent quakes and volcanic eruptions.

 After breaking up the broken part moved apart as per coriolis theory

 The plates above equator moved north, north east and to the south of equator moved south ,south west

 All plates will ultimately moving to poles,north or soth

Therefore there is more land mass at poles and less land mass at equator 

 Once the plate crossed the equator it will never come back to equator 

There was no previous supercontinent and there will not be any henceforth 

All land mass will move to poles

The closer to equator the plate move faster

At poles it becomes standstill.

 what we call collision of two plates is infact ,one plate (nearer to pole) move slowly and the plate (nearer to equator) move faster .The collision is infact due to differece in speed.

  The smaller and nearer to equator plates will move faster. 

  The plate whose 50%+ land mass is above Equator will move towards North,North East and the plate whose 50%+ land mass is below Equator will move southwards 

  The Gondwana didn't move when it was one supercontinent because the land mass of it was equally distributed above and below Equator 

  The moment it broke due to violent quakes and eruptions,the broken pieces started moving northward and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)