Earthquake prediction for May 2011

hi
May 2011 will witness the quakes as follows

1)7th May 2011---- 6.8

2)16th May 2011---6.9

3)29th May 2011----6.7

The window period is + or - one day

Day and time as per UTC

Magnitude window is + or - 0.3

Place not known

These predictions are given well in advance. Looking(observing) at cycle quakes it may change

slightly but will be given before opening of window period
Amit

Earthquake Prediction for 17th April 2011 window-

hi
Next window period ,for major earthquake is 17th April 2011. window period is + or - one day.Time in UTC.
The quake could be 6.5+
Now narrowing in on time ,it could be like this
1) 16th April---0300 UTC
2) 17th April---1030 UTC
3) 18th April---0330 UTC
These are the probable times. May be more than one quake
Place not known
Amit

Japan ,7.1and Mexico,6.5 earthquakes on 7Th April 2011

hi
Please see my earlier blog prediction
1)8th April 2011 at 1430UTC
2) 11th April 2011 at 1130 UTC
please note two major earthquakes on 7th.at Japan and Mexico

First of all I would like to state Remi is right on target

I ,still feel ,one more quake will come today ie 8th August at about 1430 UTC
Now, some question to plate tectonics
1) How and why these two quakes Japan and Mexico on same day?
2) Are these quakes connected to each other in any way?
3) Are they on same plate boundary? if not how the maximum stress relieved on the same day?
4) Is this Japan quake is aftershock? or a separate shock?
5) Are some dates prone to major quakes/eruptions all over the Globe? Why are we not asking such key questions ? Why are we not so stringent in asking questions to plate tectonics? Think out of the box.What we know is not always correct.
Amit

Java earthquake of 6.7 and Fiji quake of 6.4 and India Nepal boarder quake 5.7.on 3rd and 4th April 2011

hi
One,rather three more quakes .Java ,6.7 and Fiji quake of 6.4 and India Nepal boarder quake of 5.7 between 3/4th April as predicted
Time and again ,we have date hit quake predictions.Still we say ,it is impossible to predict major quakes.
Please give other theories a chance.
We (science and seismology) have wasted lot of time and tax payers money.
What is the harm ,if science ,seismology and govt officials ,keep vigil on given 25 odd dates in a year at prone places
It may sound like ,self praise ,but I would like to state,given enough time and resources , it is possible to predict major quakes (6.5+) with fair amount of accuracy of date and even place( a band of Long and Latt ) along the globe

next dates are 9/10th April 2011 and 17th April 2011 ,both 6.5+
Amit

April 2011 earthquake predictions-modified

hi
The originally predicted dates for April 2011 are 3rd and 17th (7.5+).
However ,they are now a bit modified as under ( with one more date and lesser magnitude).
( 1) 3rd April 2011--6.8.
(2)9/10th April 2011---7.1. (ie 9th Noon to 10th Noon UTC).
(3)17th April 2011----6.9.
Window period is + or - one day.
Magnitude window is + or - 0.3.
Amit

Myanmar earthquake,6.8-on 24th March 2011

hi
We have japan quake on 11th March ie Moon at maximum declination.Again we have myanmar earthquake on 24th afternoon.This too when Moon at maximum declination.
Besides ,cycle quake theory of 7/8 and 14/15th Day to be observed
Sun was also on zero declinations on 22/23rd

Evaluation of earthquake prediction theories(other than plate tectonics) by Science

hi
At the out set ,let me make it clear that, these are my views and I do not intend to offend any branch of Science or any body.
There are three reasonns ,why ,Other theories (specially tidal pull theory ) could not score above average
1)The averages of earthquakes occuring in a year are calculated ,on the basis of total number of quakes occuring ,incluing pre shocks and after shocks. Where as while evaluating ,only one hit per date is taken in to account,though ,there are several quakes on given date.
Considering all quakes occuring ,while calculating odds and taking in to account only one hit per day,is not justified.Either ,we take them all ,or we take only one quake per day,equally in both the cases(ie while calculating odds and while evaluating)
2) Whenever Scientists/Seismologist have evaluated the tidal pull theory ,they have only taken in to account Moon Phases(only one indicater).Very few must have taken in to account both ,phases of Moon as well as Distance of Moon from Earth ie Perigee. Thus ,only partial theory is evaluated ,which can not excced Odds ,calcualted as 1) above.
Recently ,one my friend Roger have tried to complile several indicaters simultenously .
3) Third reason ,I do not want to disclose,as it may offend science faternity
regards
Amit