110 days results - Amit Dave leading

We have results like this 1st March to 18th June 2026 (A) March to May B) 1to 18 June Chat GPT.. ..-1 -14 = -15 Gemini....... +21 -14 = +7 Claude AI...-1 -7 = -8 Google..... -12 -14 = -26 Grok ....... -15 -8 = -23 Milind dighe April only) -12 N A = -12 Grand daughter Random June only NA +21 = 21 Amit Dave +40 -1 = + 39 22Amit Dave is leading the score after 110 days test results

Dates given by AIs for July 2026

All are invited to give four random probable dates and time in UTC ,for major 6 and above quakes to occur anywhere . Please note the rules 1) Four dates for July 26 2) Time in UTC 3) margin + or - 12 hrs 6) Quakes 6 and above ,anywhere 7) Dates and time to be submitted before 28th of June 2026 8) Reference USGS catlog Here are random four dates given by AIs and random chit dates and time for major (6 and above )quakes for the month if July 26. FOR JULY 2026 Time in UTC A) Chat GPT.. 5th .....07.20 hrs 12th......18.45 hrs 21st.......02.35 hrs 29th......15.10 hrs B) Gemini 3rd........21.18 hrs 11th......04.42 hrs 19th......13.05 hrs 26th.....08.57 hrs Claude AI 5th......06.36 hrs 8th.....02.47 hrs 20th....10.05 hrs 30th....15.57 hrs Google AI 1st.........08.15 hrs 4th........07.08 hrs 21st......23.06 hrs 24th......21.47 hrs Grok 12th.......13.23 hrs 16th.......18.31 hrs 20th......09.50 hrs 28th......18.25 hrs Grand daughter's Random chit 3rd......06.18 UTC 10th....22.20 UTC 13th....07.50 UTC 27th.....03.47 UTC Amit Dave 54will be posted before 29th of June 2026

Four 6+ quakes between 15th to 17th June 2026

Four major quakes in two predicted dates 15th and 17th . Is this by chance or A fluke 15th to 17th June 2026 1) 6.2 Philippines 2) 6.7 Indonesia 3) 6.3 China 4) 6.6 Mod Atlantic ridge Watch my dates 15th and 17th June 2026 One hit in + or - 12 hrs for 15th Two major quakes ,China and mis atalantic ridge are 5 hrs early and late ( of window) YES ,THEY ARE MISS IF YOU COUNT 5 Hrs. Surprisingly seismologist predict a mega quake either tomorrow or after 500 years ,and we listen carefully But do you think ,my both dates are potent enogh enoughyou can also verify the number of volcanic activities must have increase in these 3 days

Epicenter for 15th &17th June 26

Disclaimer My theory of Earthquake predictions, potent date ,time and probable epicenter has not been approved or even peer reviewed by any renowned institutes or any Siesmologist.The dates ,time and epicenter for 6+ quakes at 120 E to 145 E may not witness any such quakes. This post is purely for academic purpose and no action what soever is required by anyone 120 degrees East to 145 East Margin + or - 1 hr Time in UTC Ref..USGS Catlog only ,if modied later version 10quakes ..6 and above at any depth 15th June 2026 A) 04.00 UTC B)11.00 UTC C)16.00 UTC D) 21.00 UTC 17th June 2026 A)04.30 UTC B)12.00 UTC C)14.00 UTC D)20.00 UTC

92 days earthquake prediction test -Amit DaveV/s AIs

You can post something like this. I would suggest being careful to present the probability as a preliminary estimate based on this specific scoring test, not as a proven scientific probability. 92-DAY EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION CHALLENGE (MARCH–MAY 2026) For the last 92 days, a public test has been running to compare earthquake prediction dates generated using my planetary tidal/gravitational hypothesis against dates generated by AI systems and other participants. Participants ChatGPT Gemini Claude AI Google AI Grok AI Milind Dighe Amit Dave Rules Four dates per month. Earthquakes of magnitude 6.0 and above only. USGS catalogue used as the final authority. UTC dates and times. Scoring system published in advance and applied equally to all participants. One 6 and above hit quake gives +5 points One 7 and above hit quake gives + 10 One missed date give -1 point One quake outside prediction window give -1 point Consolidated Score (92 Days) Participant Score Amit Dave +40 Gemini +21 ChatGPT -1 Claude AI -1 Google AI -12 Milind Dighe -12 Grok AI -15 Key Observation During this 92-day period, my predictions remained positive throughout and finished with a substantial lead over all other participants. Several notable M6+ and M7+ earthquakes occurred within the published prediction windows, including multiple major date hits. Statistical Perspective Based on the scoring outcomes obtained during this challenge, the observed performance appears unlikely to be explained by simple random date selection alone. A preliminary estimate suggests odds on the order of hundreds to one within the framework of this specific test. Invitation I invite: Seismologists IIT researchers Geophysicists Earth scientists USGS scientists Disaster management professionals to independently review the methodology, scoring system, and prediction records available in the public domain. The objective is not to claim proof, but to encourage objective examination of whether planetary tidal, gravitational, and inertial forces may contribute to earthquake triggering. For details and archived predictions: earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com⁠� — Amit Dave

92 days test results- my dates V/s Ais dates

https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/c46381f4-8227-4c3c-a65d-11ed5add5711