Roger to prove practically that,any body can give equal numbers of date hits

Roger
Now ,at least to prove your point that my predictions are below average,you should give some dates
with equal numbers of date hits.
If you can not do that,it means there is something wrong with your average calculation methods( basically due to clusters)
One which is theoretically correct should prove practically.
Every time you ask me to prove the date hits. Now ,after series of date hits, onus is on you to prove practically, that ,you or any body can give equal number of date hits
Amit

One more 7+ date hit

please see my prediction of 7+ earthquake on 12th June 2010 and actual quakes
1)7.5 Nicobar-12 June 2010 -1926 Hrs UTC
2)6.1 East coast of Japan -13th June 2010 -0302 Hrs UTC
I earnestly requaest all to work on the topic and pin point even places. In principle I hope to do so
in future
Amit

2009 prediction -Results

Tony
Here is the complete list of my 2009 prediction ,with 3 day window and quakes considered only those which are 6+
Prediction date------date(-actual quakes)
1)2.1.09-----------3.1(7.7),and (6.6)
2)4.1.09----------3.1.09(7.4)
3)11.1.09--------miss
4)12.1.09---------13.1(6.0)
5)15.1.09---------15.1(6.7 and 7.4)
6)18.1.09---------18.1(6.4)19.1(6.6 and 6.0)
7)25/26.1.09--------miss
8)9.2.09--------9.2 (6.0)
9)4.3.09---------miss
10)6.3.09--------6.3.09(6.5)
11)15.4.09------15.4(6.3),16.4(6.7)
12)22.4.09------21.4(6.2)
13)9.5.09-------10.5(6.1)
14)17.5.09------16.5(6.5)
15)18.5.09------miss
16)24.5.09-------24.5(6.0)
17)6.6.09--------5.6(6.4),6.6(6.0)
18)13.6.09------12.6(6.00,14.6(6.0)
1916.6.09-------16.6(6.1)
20)20.6.09-----miss
21)22.6.09-----13.6(6.7)
22)6.9.09------7.9(6.2 and 6.0)
23)3.10.09-----2.10(6.1 and 6.0),3.10(6.1),4.10(6.6)
24)4.10.09----4.10(6.6)
25)11.10.09-----10.10(6.6)11.10(6.0),12.10(6.2)
26)13.10.09---13.10(6.5,6.0,6.4),14.10(6.3 and 6.3)
27)18.10.09----19.10(6.0)
28)20.10.09----miss
29)24.12.09---23.12(6.0),24.12(6.3)
3026.12.09-----26.12(6.1)
Tony now I would like yo to evaluate the predictions
regards
Amit

Major quakes for June 2010

hi
In June 2010 ,following date and time are prone to major quakees as well as other natural disasters like volcanic eruptions and /or cyclones
1)6th June 2010-----0530 Hrs (IST)-----6.9
2)12th June-------- 1630 Hrs (IST)----- 7.2
3)19th June------- 1130 Hrs (IST)------6.8
4)26 th June--------1700Hrs (IST)-----7.1
please watch
Regards
Amit

sample study-planets changing direction and quakes

hi
A sample study for the year 2006 was done by me ,to check concentartion of quakes near dtaes when planets changes the direction. For study purpose Mercury was not considere as it is a small planet and have less tidal pull
In year 2006 there are 5 dates when planets changes the direction ie
3rd Feb, 5th March, 5th April, 6th July,and 7th December.
The quakes 6 -6.9, 7.0-8.0 and 8+ were checked before and after 15 days of the date on which planet changes the direction
Results are
------ ---- ---Actual----- Average (expected during the period ie 5 months)
6-6.9 -- ---------66 -----------56
7.0-8.0 ----------6 ------------6
8+ ---------------1 -----------0.5(?)
A study was also done for Jupiter when changing direction as well as closer to Earth
7th April 2007 and 7th August 2007 Jupiter changes the direction as well as closer to earth (<5.0 AU)
For 15 days before and after these dates the quakes are as follows
-- For 7th April 07 -----For Date 7h August 07
---------Actual -----------Actual --------Average (for a Month)
6-6.9 -----31 ---------------20 -------------11
7-7.9 ------1-----------------2--------------1.25
8+---------1 ----------------1 -------------0.1 (?)
I would like you to comment as to weather this is above average or not?
regards
Amit

Again a proof in favour of tidal force theory

hi
please note Vanuattu quake of 7.4 on 27th May 2010,1714 Hrs UTC,as expected.This has again made it clear that the tidal force theory is not only correct but accurate also.
Quake was just Hrs before exact full Moon
If we,still doubt the theory, only because it is against the existing theory of plate tectonics,God only save us all. Time and again it can not be stated as chance
regards
Amit

--And a miss

hi
As I regularly inform every one about my hits,it is my moral duty to inform you all a miss.
22nd May 2010 at 2315 was predicted as hit of 7+.However,the quakes were seen less than 6.
On 24th at 1618Hrs GMT a quake of 6.3was noted at Brazil.
Looking at above ,I am quite apprehensive of the quake on 28th May 2010 (6.5+)
Fingers are crossed and I am only observing
regards
Amit