Hi
The Nepal earthquake was a major one (7.9) and need some more discussions
please see my previous post ( prediction for April 2015), and note accuracy of prediction (in terms of date)
Now , I will explain the quake prediction
This month Jupiter has changed direction from retro gate to direct on 9th .Moreover Jupiter is closer to Earth ,hence the chances of major quakes will be high ,whenever Jupiter aspects Moon or Sun.
The place correspond to Sun position
In fact, as per my theory, the Jupiter and Moon will Join on 26th at 16.00 UTC
So let us hope, there should not be any major quake at the said time
also pl see my web page
http://earthquakeprediction.webs.com and see calender
Amit
The Nepal earthquake was a major one (7.9) and need some more discussions
please see my previous post ( prediction for April 2015), and note accuracy of prediction (in terms of date)
Now , I will explain the quake prediction
This month Jupiter has changed direction from retro gate to direct on 9th .Moreover Jupiter is closer to Earth ,hence the chances of major quakes will be high ,whenever Jupiter aspects Moon or Sun.
The place correspond to Sun position
In fact, as per my theory, the Jupiter and Moon will Join on 26th at 16.00 UTC
So let us hope, there should not be any major quake at the said time
also pl see my web page
http://earthquakeprediction.webs.com and see calender
Amit
15 comments:
It is always noticed that, the place of major quake are prone for major after shocks after
12 Hrs
24 Hrs
7-8th day
15th day
Amit
Hi
watch major aftershock of 6.7 in Nepal to day as expected after 24 hrs .Also not 40 minutes lag pertaing to daily Moon delay
Let seismologist not believe this.
Amit
Amit;
That's a testable idea.
I'll call main shocks as mag 7+ and aftershocks as mag 6.0 to 6.9. I'll also call mag 8+ as main and mag 6.0 to 7.9 as aftershocks, all to be within 300 km of the main quake.
Then I'll count the number of aftershocks per hour up to 15 days and we'll see if your intervals have more quakes than the other hours.
Roger
Amit;
Oh, wait, I already did that for mag 7.5 main and 6+ after.
It isn't true.
Never mind.
Roger
Hi
Heavy rains accompny quake at Nepal.
I have noticed that,time and again major quakes are accompnied by heavy rains.
You can find out from records that the statement is true ,for more than 75% cases
This also proves my universal pull theory ,which states Major quakes,volcanic eruptions and heavy rains follow same rule and theory. Thus the dates given by me are also prone to eruption and cloud burst
Amit
Roger
can you mail me the results.There is certainly some bug in your soft ware.
I can do this physically for say 10 yrs 7.5+ quakes
I f you still doubt watcg the time between 7th and 8th day
Amit
Roger
By the way ,I presume you are doing QA-QC for your software before you test my predictions and announce ,I am wrong(always) and I should quit.
Amit
Roger
There is one more term known as UAT (User Acceptance Test) ,where by user is aware of software and satisfied on trial run
Amit
Roger
while counting aftershocks ,it is not the number of aftershocks that is to be counted. It is the biggest after shocks to be counted. There could be hundreds of small quakes (2 to 3) for 15 days or even one month
Main issue is to take in to account the biggest aftershocks
Such communication errors are the main cause of you declaring my method wrong and that I should quit
Amit
Amit;
Lack of understanding here.
I said 7.5+ for main quakes, mag 6+ for aftershocks.
I have no way to do QA, QC or UAT. I wish I did, it would be very helpful.
I'm pretty sure I sent you the earlier test when it was done.
If you want a different test I can do that too. In fact I will, because the earlier version didn't last long enough.
Roger
Roger
what I mean is ,among all aftershocks(even 6+),find out the highest and second highest magnitude aftershocks;and see where they fall
Thanks Roger
Amit
By "where they fall"I mean the time/day slot and not location.Location what you have taken is ok
Amit
Amit;
To clarify; you want me to look at all mag 7.5 quakes and search for the two largest aftershocks within 15 days. Nothing below mag 6 to be considered. Aftershocks to be within 300 km?
If this is correct let me know and I will proceed.
Roger
Roger
A slight change
Two biggest aftershocks within 16 days(because sometimes it is betwen 15/16thdays)
Two biggest aftershocks can be less than 6 also (pròvided they are biggest)
Amit
My brother suggested I might like this blog. He was totally right.
This post actually made my day. You can not imagine simply
how much time I had spent for this info! Thanks!
Post a Comment