Some how I am not convinced with reasons given by plate tectonics
Some of the questions not answered by plate tectonics are1) Why there are several major (6+) quakes on a given dates spread all over the globe. Are some dates more prone to major quakes?
2) Why there are several 6+ quakes on short span at some locations like Tonga ,Japan etc.
3) Why deep quakes at more than 700 kms ? Plate thickness is 100 to 150 kms?
Subduction residue reason given is wrong
4) why so many less random 3 quakes? Is that really of built up stress? So frequently?
Yes
There are plates and they are moving but..
My version is....
Plates are due to Quakes and that the quakes are not due to plates...
Initially there was one single plate -Pengea-super continent , situated at equator ( so stable-not moving)
Due to violent quakes it broke in pieces and due to Coriolis effect ,the land masses started to drift...
1) in Northern hemisphere towards North East
2) In southern hemisphere towards South west
All land mass will ultimately go to both poles ,slowly
And there will be no another super continent as expected by scientists
Once land mass moved away from Equator will never return to equator, as shown by scientist
The proof is..
We have very less land mass at equator and huge land masses at both poles
No comments:
Post a Comment