Amit;
1) Can you show me an example of that? 2 quakes of equal mag and location.
Your cycle theory is simply wrong. The moon has nothing to do with quakes.
If it did, you would not have failed my long term test.
2) There are quakes not on plate boundaries but we do know why. Subduction zones for example.
Quakes related to volcanos for another.
Yes, your hits are due to chance. Otherwise you would not have failed my test.
Roger
AND ANSWERS TO THOSE QUESTIONS
Roger
OK, As you wish
1)As per plate tectonic theory, 7.5+ quake can occur at same location only after stresses built up again ,may be 50 years , 100 years , you specify
now look at the following quakes
a)7.9 at 10.51 UTC,at 4.5 south and 153.2 East, on 17th December 2016...PNG
b) 7.9 at 4.30 UTC, at 6.24 South and 155.17 East on 22nd January 2017....PNG
c)7.5 at 13.28 UTC at 6.7 south and 155 East on 19th April 2014....PNG
d)7.5 at 1.44 UTC at 5.46 South and 151.8 East on 5th May 2015.....PNG
e)7.5 at 12.58 UTC at 4.08 South and 152.56 East on 14th May 2019...PNG
Do you think 7.5+ quake equivalent stress can be accumulated in one month ?
How do you explain all these with plate tectonics ?
Ok next question
Look at the following quake
7.7 at Gujarat , India ( 23.4 North and 70.2 East) on 26th January 2001 at 3.16 UTC
Do you think there is volcano here
or plate boundary
or Subduction Zone
How do you explain this 7.7 major quake
SO , think out of the box
Old theories are not necessarily correct especially when it says ,it is unable to predict major quakes
Amit
