Can earthquakes be predicted?

Total Pageviews

Search This Blog

Monday, August 18, 2014

6.2 earthquake on 18th at Iran Iraq Border and My " cycle quake theory"

hi
 Time and again I have mentioned about " Cycle Quake " Theory. The term devised by me is about the major quakes (6+) occurring in a cyclic way.Which is explained as mentioned below
   Whenever a major quake occurs on a potential date (as per my theory) , the subsequent major quakes also occur on dates 7th/8th,and /or 14th/15th and /or 21st /22nd days after the first quake. These quakes can not be termed as after shocks because they may occur on any where. Nevertheless,chances of yet another major quake on the same location are high.
  Thus ,it is advisable for people in general and authorities in particular, to alert the people on such days (where major quake has already struck
  Let us check for AUGUST
 I have mentioned 10th,17th and 24th (though 3rd August was strong , as could not post on my blog before that, I have not mentioned it). for the major quakes ( watch they are in cyclic order)
 Now actual quakes in August are
1)3rd August-  6.8 and 6.1 at Micronesia
2)3rd ----------6.1 CHINA where hundred of people died
3)10th-----------6.0 Japan
4)18th-----------6.2 and 5.8 at Iran Iraq boarder
 
watch the clear cyclic pattern
 The beauty of this prediction is, there was no major quake (6+) on any date other than this cyclic nature
 The reason for such pattern is Clearly Moon .
 After every 7th /8th day Moon travel  90 degrees and occupies another potent position 90 degrees apart,hence cyclic quakes. After 15 days it will be at 180 degree apart.

If anybody would like to check ,they can try with USGS records
 I do not know why are we ignoring such striking rule.
Amit

9 comments:

Roger Hunter said...

2014-08-03 00:22:03.210Z, 0.8438,146.1445,10.55,6.9
2014-08-03 00:26:42.940Z, 1.0332,146.2562,13.96,6.1
2014-08-03 08:30:13.540Z,27.2446,103.427, 10, 6.1
Amit;

You're stretching the truth a bit here.

These are the August mag 6+ from NEIC. There were 3 on the 3rd that didn't copy for some reason

2014-08-06 11:45:22.960Z,-7.2725,128.0457,10,6.1

2014-08-10 03:43:17.130Z,41.1626,142.1761,41,6

2014-08-18 02:32:05.260Z,32.7392,47.6696,10,6.2

Anyway, the intervals were 3,4 and 8 days

Roger
They don't fit well at all

Roger

AMIT said...

Roger
I could not understand what you want to say.
1) All three quakes of 3rd are taken
2) Quakes of 10th and 18th are also taken
yes,one remaining quake of 6th ,which you have mentioned is not considered (6.1 Indonesia )
Even than. all rest of 6+ quakes fall in line
Amit

Roger Hunter said...

Amit;

That post didn't come out the way it was intended.

My point was that the quakes did not happen 7 days apart

Roger

AMIT said...

Roger
Quakes.on 3rd, 10th, and 17th/18th .Are these not in cyclic order of 7/8 dsys.
Amit

AMIT said...

Roger
I think there is some misunderstanding here
All quakes (6+) on 3rd August are to be counted as a result of one potent position. Thus we have quakes on 3rd,6th, 10th and 17/18th (18th early morning UTC
Now you can see the cyclic order ( except on 6th)
Whenever we have potent position on a given date,there could be more than one major quakes.
Best way to check this is to select major quakes of 8+ and check quakes after 7/8th day,14/15th day ,21/22nd day, anywhere over the globe.
on the date of potent positions, as the Earth rotates around axis, the quakes may occur at any weak plate boundaries coming directly under the pull
There can be two potent dates in month and hence may give two sets of cyclic dates
Amit


Roger Hunter said...

Amit;

Dates are 3,6,10,18.
Intervals are 3,4,8.

If you want to ignore some to make your point you're just fooling yourself. Given enough quakes you can support any interval you like.

Following mag 8 quake there will be aftershocks every day for months.

Roger

AMIT said...

Roger
I respect you a lot and expect you to use parliamentary words in blog.
1) if you are not open to any new out of the box idea, I can not explain this
2) I have already said earlier 3rd.10th and 18th are in cyclic order ( 6th I can explain but may be of no use
3) What you are talking is aftershocks and supposed to be at the same location. What I am saying is the quakes will occur any where on the globe as the Earth rotates and expose the fault line to potent pull
4 ) I would go one step forward and say that, the pre shocks are also part of this. Unfortunately plate tectonics can not explain pre shocks. neither it says any thing about several major quakes on a single day on different fault lines,no way connected to each other
Amit

Roger Hunter said...

Amit;

Parliamentary words??

How about this; I'll take a couple months after each mag 8 quake I find, eliminate anything nearby and we'll see what we see.

Sound good?

Roger

Roger Hunter said...

Getting anywhere with the list I sent you?

Roger