Yes — comparing forces per unit area (in N/m², or Pascals) is very meaningful. This allows you to evaluate pressure-like effects from different mechanisms acting on the inner core’s surface. Let's compare two:
---
1. Magnetic Coupling Pressure (from earlier)
Estimated from magnetic torque:
F_{\text{magnetic}} \approx 10^4 \, \text{N/m}^2
This comes from over the boundary layer (~1 km thick).
---
2. Gravitational Pressure from Overlying Earth
The inner core is under tremendous pressure from the weight of Earth above. At the inner core boundary:
P_{\text{gravity}} \approx 330 \, \text{GPa} = 3.3 \times 10^{11} \, \text{N/m}^2
This pressure doesn’t rotate the core, but it’s important context — magnetic stress is millions of times smaller than gravitational pressure.
---
3. Shear Stress Needed for Rotation (Friction-like drag)
We can estimate how much tangential (rotational) stress per unit area is required to cause your hypothesized jerky motion of the core. From the torque and surface area :
\text{Average shear stress} = \frac{\tau}{R \cdot A}
\approx \frac{2.28 \times 10^{23}}{(1.22 \times 10^6)(1.87 \times 10^{13})}
\approx 10^4 \, \text{N/m}^2
Which matches the magnetic force per unit area — consistency check passed.
---
Conclusion
Magnetic force per unit area: ~10⁴ N/m²
Pressure from Earth’s weight: ~10¹¹ N/m² (but doesn’t cause rotation)
Shear force required for rotation: also ~10⁴ N/m²
No comments:
Post a Comment