Two 6+ hit quakes

 Disclaimer..The theory is not approved by any institute and that these quakes may not occur 

Here are two 6+ quakes on predicted date

The date predicted is 30th May 2025
The Quakes are
1) South west of  Africa

Date ..30th May 2025
Magnitude .. 6.2
Time .......5.36 UTC.
Epicenter...53 degrees  South and 9 degrees East

2) Hokkaido Japan
Date .31st May 2025
Magnitude..6.1
Time .8.32 UTC
Epicenter..North & 145 East

Watch there are two major quakes in date ,one date hit and another in window period.

Not only this ,watch my epicenter hypothesis
1) SE Of Africa quake was at tge time of Local Sun rise with twilight zone margin
2)  The Japan quake was at local Sun set ,with 45 degrees margin
Any Doubts?
For more
http://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com

June 2025 prediction for major Earthquakes

 Disclaimer..These quake not occur and theory is not approved by any institute 

Here are the probable dates for major (6 and above magnitude) earthquakes for the month of June 25

The time margin is + or - one day.
The epicenter is not predicted for two reasons
1) It is an offense under Indian Disaster Act 2005
2) It is highly moving target ,the resultant pull moves along with Earth rotation
However, it will follow my epicenter location hypothesis
The dates are
1) 5th June 2025
2)11th June 2025
3) 16th June 2025
4)19th June 2025
5) 25th June 2025
Those who are not aware of my epicenter location hypothesis, it is given in nutshell here
The major quakes will occur at a location where
A) The Sun or Moon are at Zenith or Nadir
( with + or - 10 degree longitudes margin)
Or
B) The Sun or Moon are rising or Setting with + or - 45 minutes margin
Out of these date 25th June 2025 may give major quake ( 6.7+)
For more visit
https://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com

Magnetic force on Earth core and Shear force required for rotation of earth core

 Yes — comparing forces per unit area (in N/m², or Pascals) is very meaningful. This allows you to evaluate pressure-like effects from different mechanisms acting on the inner core’s surface. Let's compare two:

---

1. Magnetic Coupling Pressure (from earlier)

Estimated from magnetic torque:

F_{\text{magnetic}} \approx 10^4 \, \text{N/m}^2

This comes from  over the boundary layer (~1 km thick).


---

2. Gravitational Pressure from Overlying Earth

The inner core is under tremendous pressure from the weight of Earth above. At the inner core boundary:

P_{\text{gravity}} \approx 330 \, \text{GPa} = 3.3 \times 10^{11} \, \text{N/m}^2

This pressure doesn’t rotate the core, but it’s important context — magnetic stress is millions of times smaller than gravitational pressure.


---

3. Shear Stress Needed for Rotation (Friction-like drag)

We can estimate how much tangential (rotational) stress per unit area is required to cause your hypothesized jerky motion of the core. From the torque  and surface area :

\text{Average shear stress} = \frac{\tau}{R \cdot A}
\approx \frac{2.28 \times 10^{23}}{(1.22 \times 10^6)(1.87 \times 10^{13})}
\approx 10^4 \, \text{N/m}^2

Which matches the magnetic force per unit area — consistency check passed.


---

Conclusion

Magnetic force per unit area: ~10⁴ N/m²

Pressure from Earth’s weight: ~10¹¹ N/m² (but doesn’t cause rotation)

Shear force required for rotation: also ~10⁴ N/m²

An Extension to Hypothesis

 

Title: Hypothesis: Magnetic Torque-Induced Jerks Drive Inner Core Rotation in 26-Second Intervals

Author: AMIT DAVE


---

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel hypothesis linking the Earth's 26-second microseismic pulse to magnetic torque-induced rotational jerks of the Earth's solid inner core. Contrary to the conventional view of smooth differential rotation, we suggest that the magnetic coupling between the liquid outer core and the solid inner core produces periodic angular jerks of approximately 0.108333 degrees every 26 seconds. This accumulates to a full 360-degree rotation in 24 hours. This mechanism may explain both the Earth's hum and anomalies in core dynamics.

  This hypothesis can resolve few long unanswered questions like

1) Why Microseisms ( Earth Pulse/Beat) every 26th Second
2) Why Earth core speed ,sometimes ,differ to Earth rotation
3) Why some times ,Earth core lead in rotation by 0.1 degrees over hundreds of years( When magnetic drag exceeds ,it over shoots the core and hence can take lead)


---

1. Introduction The Earth exhibits a persistent microseismic oscillation every 26 seconds, commonly known as the Earth's hum. Traditional interpretations attribute this to ocean wave resonance or atmospheric turbulence. Meanwhile, seismological studies suggest that the inner core may rotate at a slightly different rate from the mantle. This paper explores the possibility that the Earth's hum originates from quantized magnetic torques acting on the solid inner core.


---

2. Background

2.1. Earth's Core Structure:

Inner Core: Solid, radius ~1220 km, composed primarily of iron-nickel.

Outer Core: Liquid, electrically conductive, source of geomagnetic field via dynamo effect.


2.2. Magnetic Coupling:

Differential motion of conductive layers induces Lorentz forces.

Magnetic field lines exert torque across the inner core boundary.

Prior estimates show magnetic coupling is stronger than viscous effects but weak in instantaneous acceleration.


2.3. The 26-Second Microseism:

Observed worldwide.

Source not definitively established.



---

3. Hypothesis Statement We hypothesize that magnetic coupling between the outer and inner core builds torque gradually, and when it reaches a threshold, it triggers a discrete angular jerk of 0.108333 degrees every 26 seconds. Over 24 hours, this results in a full 360-degree rotation:

 

This quantized motion could explain the observed 26-second signal as a geophysical response to internal torque release.


---

4. Supporting Physics

4.1. Torque Calculation: Estimated torque required to rotate the inner core to Earth-like angular velocity:

4.2. Torque per Unit Area: Inner core surface area: 

4.3. Magnetic Torque: Using estimated field strength and coupling models:

These values are sufficient over time to induce minor rotational steps.


---

5. Predictions and Observables

Inner core rotational anomalies should correlate with geomagnetic fluctuations.

Seismic anisotropy or scattering may reflect these periodic changes.

Artificial gyroscopic satellites could detect pulse-consistent variations in Earth's moment of inertia.



---

6. Future Work

Vacuum-based Foucault pendulum experiments.

Long-term magnetometer and seismometer correlation studies.

Numerical simulation of torque buildup and threshold release dynamics.



---

7. Conclusion This hypothesis presents a physically grounded mechanism to link Earth's magnetic field dynamics with observed 26-second microseisms. The idea that the inner core rotates via discrete magnetic jerks opens a new line of investigation into Earth's deep interior processes.


---

Hypothesis-earth core rotates in jerks

 Title: Hypothesis on Jerky Inner Core Rotation as the Cause of Earth's 26-Second Microseism

Author:  Amit Dave

Abstract: This paper presents a novel hypothesis regarding the origin of Earth's mysterious 26-second microseism, a low-frequency seismic signal observed consistently near the Gulf of Guinea. Contrary to widely accepted theories attributing this phenomenon to ocean wave interactions, this hypothesis proposes that the Earth's inner core rotates not smoothly, but in discrete jerks of approximately 0.108333 degrees every 26 seconds. While the Earth as a whole rotates uniformly in roughly 23 hours, 56 minutes (sidereal day), the inner core is theorized to undergo periodic shifts, potentially driving the 26-second pulse observed in seismic data.The location of these microseism is at longitudes 0 degrees as well as at lattitudes 0 degrees, which supports this hypothesis.

1. Introduction The Earth exhibits a subtle but consistent seismic signal repeating every 26 seconds, detected since the 1960s. Traditional explanations focus on ocean wave resonances. However, these do not account for certain regularities and fail to explain the potential global coherence. This paper explores an alternative geophysical mechanism involving differential inner core dynamics.

2. Background Earth is composed of a solid inner core, a liquid outer core, a viscous mantle, and a solid crust. Seismic studies show the inner core may rotate slightly faster than the rest of the planet, a concept known as superrotation [1]. Yet, these findings are based on gradual, continuous motion. No studies to date have investigated the possibility of discrete, periodic jerks.

3. Hypothesis I hypothesize that the inner core does not rotate uniformly but is periodically dragged forward by 0.108333 degrees every 26 seconds. This motion might result from interactions with the fluid dynamics of the outer core or electromagnetic coupling with the mantle. Each jerk could send a low-amplitude mechanical pulse through the mantle and crust, manifesting as the 26-second microseism.

4. Theoretical Model Assuming a jerk of 0.108333 degrees per 26 seconds:

Number of jerks per day = (24 hours * 3600 seconds/hour) / 26 seconds = 3315.38 ≈ 3315 jerks

Total angular shift per day = 3315 * 0.108333 degrees = 359.999475 degrees ≈ 360 degrees


To complete a full rotation (360 degrees), the inner core would require:

Time = 360 / 0.108333 degrees = 3323.999 jerks

Time in seconds = 3323.999 * 26 = 86,423.97 seconds ≈ 24 hours


This suggests the core completes a full rotation precisely every 24 hours, matching the Earth's solar day with remarkable accuracy.

Figure 1: Graphical representation of the cumulative angular displacement of the inner core versus time, illustrating discrete steps of 0.108333° every 26 seconds resulting in one complete rotation every 24 hours.

Figure 2: Schematic of Earth's interior layers, showing possible transmission pathways of the seismic pulse from the inner core to the crust.

Mechanical Considerations:

Moment of inertia of the inner core:  (approximating as a solid sphere)

Required torque: , where

Each jerk involves angular acceleration over a short time, leading to impulse-like torque signatures


5. Comparison with Observations The geographic focus of the 26-second signal near the Gulf of Guinea is not inherently contradictory. If the jerk-induced pulse travels globally but interacts constructively with oceanic or crustal structures in this region, localized amplification could occur.

6. Predictions and Tests

High-precision global seismometer arrays may detect subtle phase differences consistent with an inner-originating pulse.

Magnetometer data could reveal coupling events associated with each jerk.

Numerical models can simulate propagation from core to crust and match observed waveforms.


7. Challenges and Criticism

No direct observational evidence of inner core jerks currently exists.

Energy required for such motion may exceed plausible values unless driven by an unknown mechanism.

Must reconcile with established models of fluid dynamics and core-mantle coupling.


8. Conclusion This speculative hypothesis offers a novel mechanism for Earth's 26-second microseism, shifting focus from surface phenomena to deep Earth dynamics. While currently unverified, it suggests new avenues for research in geophysics, seismology, and planetary dynamics.

References: [1] Song, X., & Richards, P. G. (1996). Seismological evidence for differential rotation of the Earth's inner core. Nature, 382(6588), 221–224. [2] Koper, K. D., & Burlacu, R. (2015). The worldwide hum of the Earth. Nature Geoscience, 8(3), 171–172. [3] Rhie, J., & Romanowicz, B. (2004). Excitation of Earth's continuous free oscillations by atmosphere–ocean–seafloor coupling. Nature, 431(7008), 552–556.

Keywords: Inner core, Earth rotation, microseism, 26-second pulse, geodynamics, seismic resonance, core-mantle coupling
Figure -1
Figure -2

A hypothesis-Earth Microseisms

 https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/6r9e7axjqyx4xcdpykd43/Earth-core-hypothesis.txt?rlkey=2ck0umkhlhv3br7g9n4cae9wa&st=r6gcdtjd&dl=0

Some questions to Focualt Pendulam

 SOME CROSS QUESTIONS TO FOUCAULT PENDULUM 

What is the Foucault Pendulum?

The Foucault pendulum is a long, heavy pendulum that can swing freely in any vertical plane. It was first demonstrated by French physicist Léon Foucault in 1851.

Its purpose:

To show that the Earth rotates, using only a swinging pendulum and no reference to the sky.

---

How it Works

When the pendulum is set swinging in one direction (say, north-south), it keeps swinging in that direction due to inertia — it resists any change in motion.

But as the Earth rotates underneath it, the plane of the pendulum's swing appears to rotate over time.

This apparent change in direction is not caused by the pendulum itself turning, but by the floor (and the Earth) rotating beneath it.

However Here are some questions for all to answer 

 It is presumed that ,though the top hook from where the Pendulum is fixed as well as the ground rotates along with Earth ,the Pendulum does not ,(due to inertia )

Now my question are

1) How and why pendulum is not affected by Earth rotation. All things rotates along with Earth say

a)Top hook

b)Bottom ground

c)The Air,atmosphere 

 d)The man giving a push to pendulum. 

(By the way there is no animation available as per Chat GPT ,that shows all three mentioned above are rotating with Earth but the Pendulum is not rotating/affected.

2) Suppose we have a helicopter hovering over Mumbai, steadily for 12 hrs.The question is ..

Whether it can land in USA after 12 hrs ,as Earth below will rotate 180 degrees in 12 hrs?

Ok

Let us talk of inertia..

3) Suppose a plane takes off from. Terminal T2 of Mumbai and fly in the direction of rotation of Earth.( speed of Esrth rotation is 0.45 km per seconds)

The question is..

Whether,Due to inertia of moving plane ( like Focualt pendulam) the plane is not affected by Earth rotation

Though inertia of plane does make plane indifferent to Earth rotation ,how Focualt pendulam is an exception ?

A research paper on -Earthbeats after 26th second

 Title: Discrete Rotational Dynamics of Earth: A Hypothesis Linking 26-Second Angular Jerks to Global Microseisms

Author:  Amit Dave


---

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel hypothesis suggesting that Earth's rotation occurs not as a continuous motion but in discrete angular jerks of approximately 0.1084 degrees every 26 seconds. This rhythmic stepping could produce periodic seismic energy releases detectable as the globally observed 26-second microseism, colloquially known as the Earth's "heartbeat." This hypothesis challenges the prevailing view that this microseism is caused by oceanic wave interference and instead suggests a geodynamic origin linked to internal Earth mechanics. A series of experimental methods are proposed to validate this hypothesis, including precision gyroscopy, satellite orbital analysis, and synchronized seismic monitoring.


---

1. Introduction The Earth's rotation has long been modeled as a smooth, continuous process. However, a persistent and regular seismic phenomenon, the 26-second microseism, invites reconsideration of this assumption. First identified in the 1960s, this microseism originates consistently near 0° latitude, 0° longitude, in the Gulf of Guinea. Current models attribute it to ocean wave interference, yet the precise periodicity of 26 seconds has never been fully explained.
The origin at 0 degree longitudes and 0 degree lattitudes, itself suggests that these beats are originated at the core of Earth.

This paper proposes an alternative hypothesis: the Earth rotates in discrete angular steps of approximately 0.1084 degrees every 26 seconds. This would result in 13,846.15 steps per day, totaling 360 degrees in 24 hours, consistent with current Earth rotation measurements.


---

2. Background

2.1 Earth's Rotation The Earth completes one full rotation approximately every 86,400 seconds (24 hours). This equates to an average angular velocity of 0.0041667 degrees per second.

2.2 The 26-Second Microseism The 26-second microseism is a globally observed, low-frequency seismic pulse. It is unusually stable and originates consistently from a location near the Gulf of Guinea. Oceanic wave models suggest it is caused by standing wave interactions, yet this fails to explain its remarkable periodic precision.

2.3 Known Core-Mantle Dynamics The Earth's inner core exhibits differential rotation relative to the crust and mantle, potentially offering a mechanism for rotational modulation or stress build-up and release.


---

3. Hypothesis The Earth rotates via discrete steps, each of 0.1084 degrees, occurring every 26 seconds. This stepwise rotation could be due to mechanical resistance at the core-mantle boundary or other internal feedback systems, causing stress that is periodically released. These releases may produce seismic waves detected as the 26-second microseism.


---

4. Experimental Proposal

4.1 Ring Laser Gyroscopes Install high-sensitivity gyroscopes (e.g., G-ring or equivalent) in seismically stable underground locations. Detect stepwise angular changes occurring at 26-second intervals.

4.2 Global Seismic Array Synchronization Use data from the Global Seismographic Network to detect global synchronicity of the 26s microseism. Analyze waveforms to identify signatures of periodic, internal triggers.

4.3 Satellite Laser Ranging and GNSS Monitoring Analyze Earth orientation parameters (EOPs) for any 26-second periodicity in polar motion or rotation rate (UT1) that deviates from smooth models.

4.4 Ocean Wave Condition Controls Compare microseism intensity during varied oceanic conditions (calm vs. storm) to assess dependency on wave energy. A constant signal during low-wave conditions would challenge the oceanic origin model.

4.5 Magnetic Anomaly Detection Deploy magnetometers to detect any matching 26-second fluctuations in Earth’s magnetic field, potentially linked to core-driven movement.


---

5. Expected Results and Interpretation

If the Earth's rotation is stepwise:

Gyroscopes should detect small, discrete shifts in angular momentum.

Seismic signals should align globally in phase with each 26-second mark.

Satellite data may reveal micro-adjustments or pulses in rotational parameters.

Microseism persistence during calm seas would challenge the wave interference model.


If the current ocean wave theory holds:

Seismic activity would correlate with sea state.

No rotational stepping would be observed in gyroscopes or satellite data.



---

6. Conclusion This hypothesis presents a testable alternative to the oceanic explanation of the 26-second microseism. If Earth rotates in discrete jerks, it may reflect a previously unknown geodynamic process. Verification would have profound implications for our understanding of planetary rotation and internal mechanics. Further interdisciplinary studies are encouraged to pursue this avenue of inquiry.


---

7. References ( academic references to seismic data, satellite studies, core dynamics papers, gyroscope instrumentation studies, etc.)


---

Appendix

Mathematical derivation of 0.1084° per 26 seconds from Earth's daily rotation

A Peru quake

 

one more date hit 6 + quake prediction.
Today a 6 quake at Peru at 10.23 UTC
Location 15 S ,74 W
Prediction date 18th May 25 ,(+ or - one day margin)

watch my epicenter hypothesis
The quake is right at the time of Sun Rise

How many 6+ quakes are required to prove my theory ?
wake up #USGS
Wake up #JAPAN

Failure of plate tectonics

 Here is a hypothetical situation.

You are secretary of a co op hsg society.
You have appointed a security agency for security of the society.
The incharge of the company ,when asked about ,the possibility of theft ,after appoi ting the firm,reply like this,
" There is no gurantee that,the theft will not occur, after appointing his firm.In fact , there are fair amount of chance that tge theft will occur either tomorrow or after few months or may be few years."
Now  how do you handle such situation.
  Woukd you like to spend hard earned money of your society members ,over this security firm?
The irony of our seismology  is that, we as tax payers are using our money to fund the reserch and forecast of major earthquakes
However ,the seismologist firmly says that ,they can not predict earthquakes.Not only this ,they also say the devastating quake will occur either tomorrow or after 500 years.
  The human psychology says, we can not perform a task which we firmly believe that can not be performed by any means and all efforts.
  The plate tectonics theory ,base of seismology ,firmly believe that the earthquakes can not be predicted.
How and why ,thw Govt spent the hard earnwd money on a theiory ,which is clueless and helpless?
Why the Govt can not spend half of the ,hard earned tax pryaers money on new ,out of the box theories ,which are showing some good promise

Three major quakes on given date ,13th May 25

 Oh

Here are three Earthquakes
All three date hit quakes
1) Greece
Magnitude  6.2
Date 13th May 25
Time 21.53 UTC
Location 35 N ,27 E
Watch my epicenter hypothesis
The Moon is right at Zenith (overhead) at epicenter at tge time of quake
Moon at 30 E ( 3 degree Margin)
2) Mexico
Magnitude  5.9/6.0
Date 13th May 25
Time 20.43 UTC
Location 20N 107 W
Watch my epicenter hypothesis
The Moon is at Nadir At the time of quake ie  62 E ( opposite side of Earth globe)
(180-107=73 ie 11 degree margin)
3) Tonga
Magnitude..6.4
Date .14th May 25
Time.4.15 UTC
LOCATION..19S ,175 W
Watch Sun is setting Sharply at epicenter

Are these three major quakes on given date are by chance?
@USGS to note

New Mexico quake on 4th May 2025

6 quake at Indonesia, a date hit prediction

 Watch again

A date hit 6 quake at Indonesia today ie 3rd May 2025.at 12.51 UTC at 0.5 N ,121 E

Now look at the prediction
Date ..3rd May 2025...a date hit
Magnitude..6   ( prediction 6 or more)
Epicenter location...The quake is at a location where Moon is setting ( 45 before Moonset.
The date hit ,magnitude hit and follows my Epicenter location hypothesis
Wake up, Wake Up @USGS

7.5 Quake at Argentina on 2nd May 25

 Any one have any doubts now?

A major 7.4 earthquake at South of Arjentina today ie 2nd May 2025 at 12.58 UTC at 57 S ,68 W
Watch accuracy of such a major quake
Major Earthquake (6 &+) were predicted for 3rd May 2025 ,with accurate margin of + or - 12 hrs UTC ,time.
Watch the accuracy, it is 58 minutes past 12.00 hrs UTC ,so 58 minutes inside the time margin.
Not only this watch my epicenter hypothesis.
The quake was at Sun Rising time- local time.( with margin of half an hrs ,ie around 30 minutes after Sun rise)
For those new to my post
Epicenter location hypothesis is like this

The major quake will occur at a location where ,at the time of quake
1) Sun or Moon are at Zenith ( overhead) or Nadir ( opposite side of the globe ) with + or - 15 degrees longitudes margin
Or
2) Sun or Moon are rising or setting at that location with twilight zone margin ( + or - 45 minutes margin)
WAKE UP ,WAKE UP USGS