Detailed major quake prediction for 25th June 2025

 Disclaimer

My theory has not been approved  yet any institute and that the quakes mentioned below may not occur.

The major (6+) earthquake prediction for various locations on 25th June 2025
Time in UTC
Margin .+ or - 45 minutes
A) Japan and PNG
02.00 UTC ( Most potent time)
11.00
15.10
19.15 UTC...

B)TAIWAN and Indonesia
03.20 UTC....( Most potent time)
11.10 UTC
21.00 UTC

C) CA -USA
03.00 UTC
08.00 UTC
20.00 UTC ( Most potent time)

D) NZ and TONGA
00.15 UTC (Most potent Time)
05.00 UTC
12.10 UTC
19.15 UTC
The epicenter location will follow ,my epicenter location hypothesis, mentioned several times earlier

Note...If demanded the probable specific time for any country can be calculated and posted here and on my blog
https://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com
Except for India
This is because as per Indian Disaster Act 2005 ,predicting all three aspects ie Date, magnitude and location is an offense
Disclaimer..These quakes may not occur and there is no guarantee, this is only an independent study ,not approved yet

A new Hypothesis

 

Hypothesis about tidal pull drives the molten mentle deep below Earth at 2700 km

A new study shows at 2700 km below EarthCrust molten mentle is flowing horizontally.
As per Geoscience this coukd be due to heat currents, convection currents.
However ,for heat currents to flow there has to ge a temperature difference.
There can not be a temperature difference horizontally, for which it moves horizontally.
Heat currents are bottom to top .
So ,as per my General theory of tidal and Gravitational pull this could be due to tidal forces on molten mentle.
In fact ,my hypothesis says ,these movements deep inside 2700 km should follow the pattern of hightides and low tides in oceans.
This us why these molten menle move horizontally

https://www.wionews.com/science/scientists-discover-something-unexpected-moving-2-700km-under-earth-s-surface-1750225822229

Hurricane on potent date

 

Erick
#Hurricane
#cyclones
#hypothesis
#usgs
#Mexico
#earthquakeprediction

Watch my General theory of tidal and Gravitational pull ,which says the potent dates prone for Major Earthquakes are also prone for
1) Deep quakes
2) Volcanic eruptions
3) clod burst
4) Cyclones
The predicted date is 19th June 2025.
watch the landfall of cyclone ERICK is expected tomorrow ie 19th June 2025 at Mexico

https://lnkd.in/gaPZ5wrD

Volcanic eruption at Bali on potent date

 

Watch my date of major Earthquakes and Volcanic eruptions.
The predicted date is 17th June 2025, with + or - 1 dsy margin
As per the theory , the prone dates fir major (6+) quakes are also prone for Volcanic Eruptions.
Watch the eruption at Bali on 18th ,which disrupts airtraffic and closed airport
for more check
https://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bali-bound-air-india-flight-returns-to-delhi-after-volcano-erupts-near-destination-all-passengers-disembarked-2742413-2025-06-18

A hit prediction for Peru on 15th and some questions to seismologists

 Here is one more hit prediction

An Earthquake of 6.1 magnitude struck Peru on 15th June 25 as against predicted date 16th June ( with + or - one day margin)
  Details
1) Magnitude..6.1 ( 5.7 to 6.1 as per different institutes)
2) Time .16.35 UTC ( Universal Time)
3) Epicenter..12 S , 77 W

Not only this ,the epicentre of quake follow my epicenter location hypothesis
( for details see
https://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com)
The quake struch when Moon was setting at epicenter ( 30 minutes margin)

I have one question to seismologist
This quake is noted of magnitude varying from 5.7 ( USGS) to 6.1 by local seismometers.
Is it not possible to measure quake magnitude accurately ? Why every Institute have different magnitude?
Are we conversent enough with Earthquake measuring methods, and why do we claim so much about plate tectonics, when we can not measure the quake occurring on ground?

Hypothesis-unified theory of tidal and Gravitational pull

 

---

Title:
A Unified Gravitational-Tidal Hypothesis for Lithospheric, Atmospheric, and Oceanic Phenomena Across All Seven Layers of the Earth

Author:
Amit Jayprasad Dave
[earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com]

---

Abstract

This hypothesis proposes that tidal and gravitational forces—primarily from the Moon, Sun, and planets—act not just on the Earth's oceans, but on all seven structural layers of the planet, from the inner core to the atmosphere. This external force field creates a predictable sequence of natural phenomena when celestial alignments enhance their magnitude. By correlating these effects with celestial configurations, we present a unified model to explain a wide spectrum of geophysical and atmospheric events.

---

1. Introduction

Traditional geophysical models treat earthquakes, volcanoes, cyclones, and cloudbursts as disconnected processes driven by internal thermodynamics or localized meteorology. This paper introduces a gravitational-tidal hypothesis that unifies these events under a single periodic celestial force model, especially during specific planetary alignments and lunar positions.

---

2. The Seven Layers of Earth and Their Response to External Forces

The Earth is structured in seven distinct zones:

1. Inner Core
2. Outer Core (liquid)
3. Lower Mantle
4. Mantle Transition Zone
5. Upper Mantle
6. Crust
7. Atmosphere

Each layer reacts differently to periodic tidal and gravitational stress, resulting in different observable phenomena.

---

3. Predicted Phenomena on Potent Celestial Dates

3.1 Deep Earthquakes (>500 km depth)

Layer Affected: Outer Core → Mantle
Mechanism: Tidal bulging in the liquid outer core causes differential strain in the overlying mantle, triggering deep-focus quakes.

3.2 Crustal Earthquakes

Layer Affected: Upper Mantle → Crust
Mechanism: Gravitational pull influences the magma chambers beneath the crust, triggering sudden brittle failure along faults.

3.3 Crustal Bulging

Layer Affected: Lithosphere
Mechanism: Progressive tidal strain over days leads to elastic deformation or bulging, especially in intraplate zones.

3.4 Volcanic Eruptions

Layer Affected: Crust (Volcanic Conduits)
Mechanism: When the Moon or Sun is directly above (zenith) or opposite (nadir), the increased gravitational pull can rupture the volcanic plug or conduit, triggering an eruption.

3.5 Ocean Tides (Well-known)

Layer Affected: Hydrosphere
Mechanism: Tidal forces directly raise and lower ocean levels with diurnal and semi-diurnal frequency.

3.6 Cloudbursts

Layer Affected: Lower Atmosphere
Mechanism: High tide effects concentrate moist air masses. When convergence occurs due to gravity-induced pooling, rapid condensation and release results in extreme precipitation.

3.7 Cyclones

Layer Affected: Atmosphere
Mechanism: Low tide effect creates temporary pressure drops. Warm ocean water (>26–28°C) allows this instability to amplify into a full-fledged cyclone as latent heat is absorbed.

---

4. Celestial Alignment as a Trigger

The hypothesis asserts that events are most likely to occur when:

• Multiple planets are in alignment (especially when one changes motion—retrograde to direct or vice versa).
• The Moon forms strong geometric relationships with the Sun and/or planets.
• The Sun or Moon is at zenith, nadir, rising, or setting relative to the Earth's surface.

---

5. Supporting Observations

• Deep quakes cluster near celestial alignments (e.g., Tonga, Japan trench).
• Cloudbursts and cyclones often coincide with new/full moons or eclipses.
• Volcanic eruptions tend to align with gravitational peak windows.
• Anomalies like intraplate quakes and double events are explainable via tidal stress propagation across layers.

---

6. Testable Predictions

This hypothesis enables forward prediction of high-risk dates for:

• Earthquakes
• Volcanic eruptions
• Cloudbursts
• Cyclones

Each is forecast based on planetary ephemerides, lunar perigee/apogee, and solar-lunar declination. Past successful predictions (e.g., blog records) offer preliminary support.

---

7. Conclusion

Gravitational and tidal forces from celestial bodies influence all seven layers of Earth, resulting in a predictable suite of natural phenomena. This model offers a holistic alternative to fragmented geophysical explanations and has practical utility in early warning systems.

---

General theory of tidal and Gravitational pull

 General theory of tidal and Gravitational pull applicable at  all seven  layers and can produce following on the potent date predicted

1)Produce deep quake, more than 500 km depth, tidal and Gravitational pull when applied on outer liquid core of Earth

2) Produce the quake in the upper crust, when applied on molten magma below upper crust

3) Buldging of Earth crust, 

4) Volcanic eruption, when the high tide pull is applied on the mouth of a volcano, which break open the mouth and an eruption occur

5) Hightides and low tides in the Oceans which we all are aware

6)Cloud burst, when Hightide pull applied on the moist clouds, making them to concentrate at a location, resulting in cloud brust

7) Cyclones, when low tide effect create partial vaccum in the atmosphere and when air moves to fill this partial vaccum, cross over oceans with water temperature 26 to 28 degrees Celsius it geathers latent heat of water and ultimately produce a tropical cyclone

A RAREST OF RARE DATE ,25th June 2025

 A RAREST OF RARE DATE 25th June 2025

Disclaimer..My theory is not approved by any institute and that these quakes may not occur

Why Dt 25th June 2025 is most potent dare for major Earthquakes and Volcanic eruptions ?

For this we have to understand few basics

1) Declinations of planets..

It is the angular degree measure of a planet with respect to Earth equator. North or South

2) Maximum Declinations..Planets ,including Sun and Moon move towards North or South, Germany up to 23 degrees N or South 

3) Stand still of planets and reverse motion.

After reaching maximum declinatiins the planets, Sun and Moon became stand still at that maximum declinatiins for few days  ,two to five days and later reverse the direction. 

This for Sun ,we term it as - uttarayan or Dakshinayan

4) Why Standstill are important in Earthquake Prediction ?

 This is because when they reverse the motion it induces jerks in molten magma inside the Earth Crust .It is like applying brakes or acceleratior to a car ,which gives jerks due to momentum 

5)Sun reaches stand still twice in a year ,up to 23 .2 degree N or South.during 20 to 23 December and 20 to 23 June every year

6) Moon reaches maximum declinatiins twice in a month up to 23 degrees N or S.

However, once in 18.6 years it reaches up to 28.5 degrees once in 18.6 years 

7) Jupiter reaches maximum declinatiins of 23.3 degrees N or S once in about 12 years

Now look at date 25th June 2025.

All three Sun ,Jupiter and Moon are at maximum declinatiins and standstill .

Not only this Moon is at 28 degrees ,a rare once in 18.6 years

Thus 

All three Sun ,Jupiter and Moon ( 28+ degrees) are at Maximum Declinations and joining on 25th June 2025 

THIS IS A RAREST OF RARE ASTRONOMICAL INCIDENCE, ONCE IN 3000 TO 5000 YEARS.

So ,25th June 2025 is a rarest of rare case.

Now ,we talk about Taiwan and Japan potent time on 25th June 2025 

Probable times are

02.00 UTC ( more potent time)

10.30 UTC

16.30 UTC

18.30 UTC

Taiwn aftershock prediction on 19th June 25

 Disclaimer..My theory of major Earthquake prediction is not approved by any of the institutions. There are chances that ,these quakes may not occur

As per my after shocks hypothesis, after major quake , considerable high magnitude aftershocks may occur.
After 12 hrs
            24 hrs
            7/8th Day
             14/15th day
We have a major quake at Taiwan on 11th June 2025
Next major quake/aftershock at Taiwam may occur on 18th/19th of June 2025
  Here are the probable time in UTC to be watched ( with 1 hr margin)
Date ..18th June 25...22.00 hrs UTC
Date ..19th June 25
        04.00 UTC
         10.30 UTC
           16.30 UTC
           22.30 UTC
Since Japan is nearer in longitudes to Taiwn ,these time are also applicable to Japan 

Taiwan Earthquake 11th June 2025

 Here is one more date hit Earthquake prediction

Prediction date 11th June 2025.
Magnitude predicted 6 or more Magnitude
Actual Earthquake
Date 11th June 25  .a date hit prediction
Magnitude...6.1 ( it is mentioned between 5.9 to 6.4)
Location.  Taiwan
Time ..11.03 UTC
Location..23 N  122 E
Not only this watch my epicenter location hypothesis
The quake occured at the time of Sun setting and Moon Rising ( as it is a full Moon day)
Wake up USGS

Some Bold statements

 Some bold statements

A) Plates are due to Quakes and that Quakes are not due to plates
B) Think out of the box - Major Earthquakes can be predicted
C) There was only one and only one supercontinent, Pangea
D) Plates move due to Coriolis effect and not heat currents
E) Ultimately all land mass will be contracted at both poles,the proof is there is very less mass at Equator and more at both poles
F) After a major quake of 7+ magnitude, aftershocks, follow a pattern of 12 hrs ,24 hrs ,7th/8th day and 14th / 15 th day
G) Deep quakes are due to pull on outer core fluid as the same pull responsible for upper crust quakes
H) Microseisms, ie Earth beat ,(small seismic pulse ) every 26 th seconds is due to Earth core rotation in jerks ie0.108333 degrees every 26th Second, by magnetic coupling
I) Dates prone to major Earthquakes are also prone to Volcanic eruptions
J) Epicenter of major quakes follow ,epicenter location hypothesis ie at a location where Sun or Moon are at Zenith or Nadir
Or
Sun and Moon are rising or setting
K) After 50 years it would be possible to reduce the magnitude of Earthquake in major cities by artificially inducing Volcanic eruptions at remote places, at same longitudes 

Hypothesis on Volcanic eruptions

 Watch my hypothesis of Volcanic eruptions on the dates prone to major Earthquakes

The date for 6+ quakes was 5th June 2025.
Although we already have a major quake of 6.4 at Chile on 6th June 25 ,here is the proof of my hypothesis on volcanic eruption
We have two major volcanic eruptions around 5th June 25
1) On 4t June 25
Kilauea volcano at Hawai erupted on 4th sending lava fountain up to 1000 ft
2) On 6th June 25
Fuego volcano at Guetmal erupted on 6th
Both volcanic eruption in + or - one day of my major earthquake date (5th June 25)
The hypothesis says..
Both major Earthquakes and  eruptions occur due to same combination of pulls
a) Tidal pull
b) Gravitational pull
c) Inertia pull due to planet changing the direction from Direct to retrogate or vice a versa.This force is like force observed while breaking a car or while pressing an acceleratior of car
One more supporting hypothesis, I suggest here is..
In case of volcanic eruption it occurs only at the time of Hightide at local /volcano location
Or.
In other words it starts at the time of Sun or Moon at Zenith or Nadir at volcanic mouth

Chile quake ,6.4 on 6th June 25 ,a date hit

 

watch prediction on my blog for 6+ quake on 5th June 25 ,with + or - 1 day margin
And a major 6.4 quake just now at Chile
Not only the date hit but with
Epicenter hypothesis accuracy
The quake was at 17.15 UTC and at 27 S ,71 West
The Sun was right overhead ie at 78 W

For more
https://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com

Two 6+ hit quakes

 Disclaimer..The theory is not approved by any institute and that these quakes may not occur 

Here are two 6+ quakes on predicted date

The date predicted is 30th May 2025
The Quakes are
1) South west of  Africa

Date ..30th May 2025
Magnitude .. 6.2
Time .......5.36 UTC.
Epicenter...53 degrees  South and 9 degrees East

2) Hokkaido Japan
Date .31st May 2025
Magnitude..6.1
Time .8.32 UTC
Epicenter..North & 145 East

Watch there are two major quakes in date ,one date hit and another in window period.

Not only this ,watch my epicenter hypothesis
1) SE Of Africa quake was at tge time of Local Sun rise with twilight zone margin
2)  The Japan quake was at local Sun set ,with 45 degrees margin
Any Doubts?
For more
http://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com

June 2025 prediction for major Earthquakes

 Disclaimer..These quake not occur and theory is not approved by any institute 

Here are the probable dates for major (6 and above magnitude) earthquakes for the month of June 25

The time margin is + or - one day.
The epicenter is not predicted for two reasons
1) It is an offense under Indian Disaster Act 2005
2) It is highly moving target ,the resultant pull moves along with Earth rotation
However, it will follow my epicenter location hypothesis
The dates are
1) 5th June 2025
2)11th June 2025
3) 16th June 2025
4)19th June 2025
5) 25th June 2025
Those who are not aware of my epicenter location hypothesis, it is given in nutshell here
The major quakes will occur at a location where
A) The Sun or Moon are at Zenith or Nadir
( with + or - 10 degree longitudes margin)
Or
B) The Sun or Moon are rising or Setting with + or - 45 minutes margin
Out of these date 25th June 2025 may give major quake ( 6.7+)
For more visit
https://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com

Magnetic force on Earth core and Shear force required for rotation of earth core

 Yes — comparing forces per unit area (in N/m², or Pascals) is very meaningful. This allows you to evaluate pressure-like effects from different mechanisms acting on the inner core’s surface. Let's compare two:

---

1. Magnetic Coupling Pressure (from earlier)

Estimated from magnetic torque:

F_{\text{magnetic}} \approx 10^4 \, \text{N/m}^2

This comes from  over the boundary layer (~1 km thick).


---

2. Gravitational Pressure from Overlying Earth

The inner core is under tremendous pressure from the weight of Earth above. At the inner core boundary:

P_{\text{gravity}} \approx 330 \, \text{GPa} = 3.3 \times 10^{11} \, \text{N/m}^2

This pressure doesn’t rotate the core, but it’s important context — magnetic stress is millions of times smaller than gravitational pressure.


---

3. Shear Stress Needed for Rotation (Friction-like drag)

We can estimate how much tangential (rotational) stress per unit area is required to cause your hypothesized jerky motion of the core. From the torque  and surface area :

\text{Average shear stress} = \frac{\tau}{R \cdot A}
\approx \frac{2.28 \times 10^{23}}{(1.22 \times 10^6)(1.87 \times 10^{13})}
\approx 10^4 \, \text{N/m}^2

Which matches the magnetic force per unit area — consistency check passed.


---

Conclusion

Magnetic force per unit area: ~10⁴ N/m²

Pressure from Earth’s weight: ~10¹¹ N/m² (but doesn’t cause rotation)

Shear force required for rotation: also ~10⁴ N/m²

An Extension to Hypothesis

 

Title: Hypothesis: Magnetic Torque-Induced Jerks Drive Inner Core Rotation in 26-Second Intervals

Author: AMIT DAVE


---

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel hypothesis linking the Earth's 26-second microseismic pulse to magnetic torque-induced rotational jerks of the Earth's solid inner core. Contrary to the conventional view of smooth differential rotation, we suggest that the magnetic coupling between the liquid outer core and the solid inner core produces periodic angular jerks of approximately 0.108333 degrees every 26 seconds. This accumulates to a full 360-degree rotation in 24 hours. This mechanism may explain both the Earth's hum and anomalies in core dynamics.

  This hypothesis can resolve few long unanswered questions like

1) Why Microseisms ( Earth Pulse/Beat) every 26th Second
2) Why Earth core speed ,sometimes ,differ to Earth rotation
3) Why some times ,Earth core lead in rotation by 0.1 degrees over hundreds of years( When magnetic drag exceeds ,it over shoots the core and hence can take lead)


---

1. Introduction The Earth exhibits a persistent microseismic oscillation every 26 seconds, commonly known as the Earth's hum. Traditional interpretations attribute this to ocean wave resonance or atmospheric turbulence. Meanwhile, seismological studies suggest that the inner core may rotate at a slightly different rate from the mantle. This paper explores the possibility that the Earth's hum originates from quantized magnetic torques acting on the solid inner core.


---

2. Background

2.1. Earth's Core Structure:

Inner Core: Solid, radius ~1220 km, composed primarily of iron-nickel.

Outer Core: Liquid, electrically conductive, source of geomagnetic field via dynamo effect.


2.2. Magnetic Coupling:

Differential motion of conductive layers induces Lorentz forces.

Magnetic field lines exert torque across the inner core boundary.

Prior estimates show magnetic coupling is stronger than viscous effects but weak in instantaneous acceleration.


2.3. The 26-Second Microseism:

Observed worldwide.

Source not definitively established.



---

3. Hypothesis Statement We hypothesize that magnetic coupling between the outer and inner core builds torque gradually, and when it reaches a threshold, it triggers a discrete angular jerk of 0.108333 degrees every 26 seconds. Over 24 hours, this results in a full 360-degree rotation:

 

This quantized motion could explain the observed 26-second signal as a geophysical response to internal torque release.


---

4. Supporting Physics

4.1. Torque Calculation: Estimated torque required to rotate the inner core to Earth-like angular velocity:

4.2. Torque per Unit Area: Inner core surface area: 

4.3. Magnetic Torque: Using estimated field strength and coupling models:

These values are sufficient over time to induce minor rotational steps.


---

5. Predictions and Observables

Inner core rotational anomalies should correlate with geomagnetic fluctuations.

Seismic anisotropy or scattering may reflect these periodic changes.

Artificial gyroscopic satellites could detect pulse-consistent variations in Earth's moment of inertia.



---

6. Future Work

Vacuum-based Foucault pendulum experiments.

Long-term magnetometer and seismometer correlation studies.

Numerical simulation of torque buildup and threshold release dynamics.



---

7. Conclusion This hypothesis presents a physically grounded mechanism to link Earth's magnetic field dynamics with observed 26-second microseisms. The idea that the inner core rotates via discrete magnetic jerks opens a new line of investigation into Earth's deep interior processes.


---

Hypothesis-earth core rotates in jerks

 Title: Hypothesis on Jerky Inner Core Rotation as the Cause of Earth's 26-Second Microseism

Author:  Amit Dave

Abstract: This paper presents a novel hypothesis regarding the origin of Earth's mysterious 26-second microseism, a low-frequency seismic signal observed consistently near the Gulf of Guinea. Contrary to widely accepted theories attributing this phenomenon to ocean wave interactions, this hypothesis proposes that the Earth's inner core rotates not smoothly, but in discrete jerks of approximately 0.108333 degrees every 26 seconds. While the Earth as a whole rotates uniformly in roughly 23 hours, 56 minutes (sidereal day), the inner core is theorized to undergo periodic shifts, potentially driving the 26-second pulse observed in seismic data.The location of these microseism is at longitudes 0 degrees as well as at lattitudes 0 degrees, which supports this hypothesis.

1. Introduction The Earth exhibits a subtle but consistent seismic signal repeating every 26 seconds, detected since the 1960s. Traditional explanations focus on ocean wave resonances. However, these do not account for certain regularities and fail to explain the potential global coherence. This paper explores an alternative geophysical mechanism involving differential inner core dynamics.

2. Background Earth is composed of a solid inner core, a liquid outer core, a viscous mantle, and a solid crust. Seismic studies show the inner core may rotate slightly faster than the rest of the planet, a concept known as superrotation [1]. Yet, these findings are based on gradual, continuous motion. No studies to date have investigated the possibility of discrete, periodic jerks.

3. Hypothesis I hypothesize that the inner core does not rotate uniformly but is periodically dragged forward by 0.108333 degrees every 26 seconds. This motion might result from interactions with the fluid dynamics of the outer core or electromagnetic coupling with the mantle. Each jerk could send a low-amplitude mechanical pulse through the mantle and crust, manifesting as the 26-second microseism.

4. Theoretical Model Assuming a jerk of 0.108333 degrees per 26 seconds:

Number of jerks per day = (24 hours * 3600 seconds/hour) / 26 seconds = 3315.38 ≈ 3315 jerks

Total angular shift per day = 3315 * 0.108333 degrees = 359.999475 degrees ≈ 360 degrees


To complete a full rotation (360 degrees), the inner core would require:

Time = 360 / 0.108333 degrees = 3323.999 jerks

Time in seconds = 3323.999 * 26 = 86,423.97 seconds ≈ 24 hours


This suggests the core completes a full rotation precisely every 24 hours, matching the Earth's solar day with remarkable accuracy.

Figure 1: Graphical representation of the cumulative angular displacement of the inner core versus time, illustrating discrete steps of 0.108333° every 26 seconds resulting in one complete rotation every 24 hours.

Figure 2: Schematic of Earth's interior layers, showing possible transmission pathways of the seismic pulse from the inner core to the crust.

Mechanical Considerations:

Moment of inertia of the inner core:  (approximating as a solid sphere)

Required torque: , where

Each jerk involves angular acceleration over a short time, leading to impulse-like torque signatures


5. Comparison with Observations The geographic focus of the 26-second signal near the Gulf of Guinea is not inherently contradictory. If the jerk-induced pulse travels globally but interacts constructively with oceanic or crustal structures in this region, localized amplification could occur.

6. Predictions and Tests

High-precision global seismometer arrays may detect subtle phase differences consistent with an inner-originating pulse.

Magnetometer data could reveal coupling events associated with each jerk.

Numerical models can simulate propagation from core to crust and match observed waveforms.


7. Challenges and Criticism

No direct observational evidence of inner core jerks currently exists.

Energy required for such motion may exceed plausible values unless driven by an unknown mechanism.

Must reconcile with established models of fluid dynamics and core-mantle coupling.


8. Conclusion This speculative hypothesis offers a novel mechanism for Earth's 26-second microseism, shifting focus from surface phenomena to deep Earth dynamics. While currently unverified, it suggests new avenues for research in geophysics, seismology, and planetary dynamics.

References: [1] Song, X., & Richards, P. G. (1996). Seismological evidence for differential rotation of the Earth's inner core. Nature, 382(6588), 221–224. [2] Koper, K. D., & Burlacu, R. (2015). The worldwide hum of the Earth. Nature Geoscience, 8(3), 171–172. [3] Rhie, J., & Romanowicz, B. (2004). Excitation of Earth's continuous free oscillations by atmosphere–ocean–seafloor coupling. Nature, 431(7008), 552–556.

Keywords: Inner core, Earth rotation, microseism, 26-second pulse, geodynamics, seismic resonance, core-mantle coupling
Figure -1
Figure -2

A hypothesis-Earth Microseisms

 https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/6r9e7axjqyx4xcdpykd43/Earth-core-hypothesis.txt?rlkey=2ck0umkhlhv3br7g9n4cae9wa&st=r6gcdtjd&dl=0

Some questions to Focualt Pendulam

 SOME CROSS QUESTIONS TO FOUCAULT PENDULUM 

What is the Foucault Pendulum?

The Foucault pendulum is a long, heavy pendulum that can swing freely in any vertical plane. It was first demonstrated by French physicist Léon Foucault in 1851.

Its purpose:

To show that the Earth rotates, using only a swinging pendulum and no reference to the sky.

---

How it Works

When the pendulum is set swinging in one direction (say, north-south), it keeps swinging in that direction due to inertia — it resists any change in motion.

But as the Earth rotates underneath it, the plane of the pendulum's swing appears to rotate over time.

This apparent change in direction is not caused by the pendulum itself turning, but by the floor (and the Earth) rotating beneath it.

However Here are some questions for all to answer 

 It is presumed that ,though the top hook from where the Pendulum is fixed as well as the ground rotates along with Earth ,the Pendulum does not ,(due to inertia )

Now my question are

1) How and why pendulum is not affected by Earth rotation. All things rotates along with Earth say

a)Top hook

b)Bottom ground

c)The Air,atmosphere 

 d)The man giving a push to pendulum. 

(By the way there is no animation available as per Chat GPT ,that shows all three mentioned above are rotating with Earth but the Pendulum is not rotating/affected.

2) Suppose we have a helicopter hovering over Mumbai, steadily for 12 hrs.The question is ..

Whether it can land in USA after 12 hrs ,as Earth below will rotate 180 degrees in 12 hrs?

Ok

Let us talk of inertia..

3) Suppose a plane takes off from. Terminal T2 of Mumbai and fly in the direction of rotation of Earth.( speed of Esrth rotation is 0.45 km per seconds)

The question is..

Whether,Due to inertia of moving plane ( like Focualt pendulam) the plane is not affected by Earth rotation

Though inertia of plane does make plane indifferent to Earth rotation ,how Focualt pendulam is an exception ?

A research paper on -Earthbeats after 26th second

 Title: Discrete Rotational Dynamics of Earth: A Hypothesis Linking 26-Second Angular Jerks to Global Microseisms

Author:  Amit Dave


---

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel hypothesis suggesting that Earth's rotation occurs not as a continuous motion but in discrete angular jerks of approximately 0.1084 degrees every 26 seconds. This rhythmic stepping could produce periodic seismic energy releases detectable as the globally observed 26-second microseism, colloquially known as the Earth's "heartbeat." This hypothesis challenges the prevailing view that this microseism is caused by oceanic wave interference and instead suggests a geodynamic origin linked to internal Earth mechanics. A series of experimental methods are proposed to validate this hypothesis, including precision gyroscopy, satellite orbital analysis, and synchronized seismic monitoring.


---

1. Introduction The Earth's rotation has long been modeled as a smooth, continuous process. However, a persistent and regular seismic phenomenon, the 26-second microseism, invites reconsideration of this assumption. First identified in the 1960s, this microseism originates consistently near 0° latitude, 0° longitude, in the Gulf of Guinea. Current models attribute it to ocean wave interference, yet the precise periodicity of 26 seconds has never been fully explained.
The origin at 0 degree longitudes and 0 degree lattitudes, itself suggests that these beats are originated at the core of Earth.

This paper proposes an alternative hypothesis: the Earth rotates in discrete angular steps of approximately 0.1084 degrees every 26 seconds. This would result in 13,846.15 steps per day, totaling 360 degrees in 24 hours, consistent with current Earth rotation measurements.


---

2. Background

2.1 Earth's Rotation The Earth completes one full rotation approximately every 86,400 seconds (24 hours). This equates to an average angular velocity of 0.0041667 degrees per second.

2.2 The 26-Second Microseism The 26-second microseism is a globally observed, low-frequency seismic pulse. It is unusually stable and originates consistently from a location near the Gulf of Guinea. Oceanic wave models suggest it is caused by standing wave interactions, yet this fails to explain its remarkable periodic precision.

2.3 Known Core-Mantle Dynamics The Earth's inner core exhibits differential rotation relative to the crust and mantle, potentially offering a mechanism for rotational modulation or stress build-up and release.


---

3. Hypothesis The Earth rotates via discrete steps, each of 0.1084 degrees, occurring every 26 seconds. This stepwise rotation could be due to mechanical resistance at the core-mantle boundary or other internal feedback systems, causing stress that is periodically released. These releases may produce seismic waves detected as the 26-second microseism.


---

4. Experimental Proposal

4.1 Ring Laser Gyroscopes Install high-sensitivity gyroscopes (e.g., G-ring or equivalent) in seismically stable underground locations. Detect stepwise angular changes occurring at 26-second intervals.

4.2 Global Seismic Array Synchronization Use data from the Global Seismographic Network to detect global synchronicity of the 26s microseism. Analyze waveforms to identify signatures of periodic, internal triggers.

4.3 Satellite Laser Ranging and GNSS Monitoring Analyze Earth orientation parameters (EOPs) for any 26-second periodicity in polar motion or rotation rate (UT1) that deviates from smooth models.

4.4 Ocean Wave Condition Controls Compare microseism intensity during varied oceanic conditions (calm vs. storm) to assess dependency on wave energy. A constant signal during low-wave conditions would challenge the oceanic origin model.

4.5 Magnetic Anomaly Detection Deploy magnetometers to detect any matching 26-second fluctuations in Earth’s magnetic field, potentially linked to core-driven movement.


---

5. Expected Results and Interpretation

If the Earth's rotation is stepwise:

Gyroscopes should detect small, discrete shifts in angular momentum.

Seismic signals should align globally in phase with each 26-second mark.

Satellite data may reveal micro-adjustments or pulses in rotational parameters.

Microseism persistence during calm seas would challenge the wave interference model.


If the current ocean wave theory holds:

Seismic activity would correlate with sea state.

No rotational stepping would be observed in gyroscopes or satellite data.



---

6. Conclusion This hypothesis presents a testable alternative to the oceanic explanation of the 26-second microseism. If Earth rotates in discrete jerks, it may reflect a previously unknown geodynamic process. Verification would have profound implications for our understanding of planetary rotation and internal mechanics. Further interdisciplinary studies are encouraged to pursue this avenue of inquiry.


---

7. References ( academic references to seismic data, satellite studies, core dynamics papers, gyroscope instrumentation studies, etc.)


---

Appendix

Mathematical derivation of 0.1084° per 26 seconds from Earth's daily rotation

A Peru quake

 

one more date hit 6 + quake prediction.
Today a 6 quake at Peru at 10.23 UTC
Location 15 S ,74 W
Prediction date 18th May 25 ,(+ or - one day margin)

watch my epicenter hypothesis
The quake is right at the time of Sun Rise

How many 6+ quakes are required to prove my theory ?
wake up #USGS
Wake up #JAPAN

Failure of plate tectonics

 Here is a hypothetical situation.

You are secretary of a co op hsg society.
You have appointed a security agency for security of the society.
The incharge of the company ,when asked about ,the possibility of theft ,after appoi ting the firm,reply like this,
" There is no gurantee that,the theft will not occur, after appointing his firm.In fact , there are fair amount of chance that tge theft will occur either tomorrow or after few months or may be few years."
Now  how do you handle such situation.
  Woukd you like to spend hard earned money of your society members ,over this security firm?
The irony of our seismology  is that, we as tax payers are using our money to fund the reserch and forecast of major earthquakes
However ,the seismologist firmly says that ,they can not predict earthquakes.Not only this ,they also say the devastating quake will occur either tomorrow or after 500 years.
  The human psychology says, we can not perform a task which we firmly believe that can not be performed by any means and all efforts.
  The plate tectonics theory ,base of seismology ,firmly believe that the earthquakes can not be predicted.
How and why ,thw Govt spent the hard earnwd money on a theiory ,which is clueless and helpless?
Why the Govt can not spend half of the ,hard earned tax pryaers money on new ,out of the box theories ,which are showing some good promise

Three major quakes on given date ,13th May 25

 Oh

Here are three Earthquakes
All three date hit quakes
1) Greece
Magnitude  6.2
Date 13th May 25
Time 21.53 UTC
Location 35 N ,27 E
Watch my epicenter hypothesis
The Moon is right at Zenith (overhead) at epicenter at tge time of quake
Moon at 30 E ( 3 degree Margin)
2) Mexico
Magnitude  5.9/6.0
Date 13th May 25
Time 20.43 UTC
Location 20N 107 W
Watch my epicenter hypothesis
The Moon is at Nadir At the time of quake ie  62 E ( opposite side of Earth globe)
(180-107=73 ie 11 degree margin)
3) Tonga
Magnitude..6.4
Date .14th May 25
Time.4.15 UTC
LOCATION..19S ,175 W
Watch Sun is setting Sharply at epicenter

Are these three major quakes on given date are by chance?
@USGS to note

New Mexico quake on 4th May 2025

6 quake at Indonesia, a date hit prediction

 Watch again

A date hit 6 quake at Indonesia today ie 3rd May 2025.at 12.51 UTC at 0.5 N ,121 E

Now look at the prediction
Date ..3rd May 2025...a date hit
Magnitude..6   ( prediction 6 or more)
Epicenter location...The quake is at a location where Moon is setting ( 45 before Moonset.
The date hit ,magnitude hit and follows my Epicenter location hypothesis
Wake up, Wake Up @USGS

7.5 Quake at Argentina on 2nd May 25

 Any one have any doubts now?

A major 7.4 earthquake at South of Arjentina today ie 2nd May 2025 at 12.58 UTC at 57 S ,68 W
Watch accuracy of such a major quake
Major Earthquake (6 &+) were predicted for 3rd May 2025 ,with accurate margin of + or - 12 hrs UTC ,time.
Watch the accuracy, it is 58 minutes past 12.00 hrs UTC ,so 58 minutes inside the time margin.
Not only this watch my epicenter hypothesis.
The quake was at Sun Rising time- local time.( with margin of half an hrs ,ie around 30 minutes after Sun rise)
For those new to my post
Epicenter location hypothesis is like this

The major quake will occur at a location where ,at the time of quake
1) Sun or Moon are at Zenith ( overhead) or Nadir ( opposite side of the globe ) with + or - 15 degrees longitudes margin
Or
2) Sun or Moon are rising or setting at that location with twilight zone margin ( + or - 45 minutes margin)
WAKE UP ,WAKE UP USGS

May 25 ,Earthquake prediction

 Here are potent dates for major( 6 and above) Earthquakes and Volcanic eruptions.

Please note that ,the location of epicenter or eruptions are not given for two reasons
1) It is a crime ,under Indian Disaster Act 2005 , predicting all three aspects ,ie Date, magnitude and location is a crime
2) The epicenter follow my epicenter location hypothesis, but location depends on e act time of quake.The location where the tidal pull ,Gravitational pull and acceleration/retardation on magma exceed the critical limit at that location, the quake or eruptions nay occur.
For those who are not conversent with hypothesis, it is ( in nutshell) like this
a) The location will be at a place where Sun or Moon are at Zenith ( overhead) or At Nadir ( 180 degrees longitudes) apart.
(+ or - 15 degrees longitudes)
Or
b) The location where Sun or Moon are rising or setting ( + or - 45 minutes)
The probable dates are
1) 3rd May2025...
2)13th May 2025
3)18th May 2025
4)27th May 2025
5)30th May 2025
Time /Day ...UTC
With margin + or - 12 hrs
Magnitude margin + or - 0.3
Disclaimer. These quakes/eruptions may not occur and the theory is not approved by any institute

Challenge ..Here are five dates with + or - 12 hrs margin .So total 10 dates used out of 31 dates.Thus the  0.32 % of quakes of 6 and above with + or - are expected as per law of averages. If the quakes are more than 0.32  % , the theory should be viewed seriously 

Two major quakes on 29th April 25

 

There are two major quakes today 29th April 2025.
first a 6.2 south if New Zealand at 13.16 UTC at 48 S , 165 E
Second South of Australia at 14.53 UTC ,at 54 S ,156 E
Yes
My Further calculations for May 25 are still not complete. However, prima facie 1st/2nd May 25 are potent dates

Nevertheless, watch my epicenter location hypothesis, both quakes are at a time of local midnight ( ie Sun is at Nadir ,Opposite side of the globe

Why Scientist and Seismologist should not be arrested?

 Watch these two news

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1jx7n3jee9o

And

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/etimes/trending/is-the-great-himalayan-earthquake-to-happen-soon/articleshow/120301259.cms

It says a Tik Tok star has been arrested by Maymar authorities for predictiong Earthquake at Maymar ( after big one 7.7)

Wheres so called scientist and seismologist can predict any thing ( with certainity).However not stating dates.

Hence keeping people on toes for years together

Why Scientist and Seismologist should not be arrested?

Here is reserch..what I have been saying for 20 years

 

https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/srl/article-abstract/doi/10.1785/0220240340/651887/Detecting-Tidal-Periodicities-of-Earthquake?redirectedFrom=fulltext&sfnsn=wiwspwa

Watch Here
What I have been saying and posting on my blog repeatedly, is now published as a reserch paper by Seismology for amateurs

Watch a way of #seismogy
Watch for more theory ,dates and hypothesis
https://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com

Ecuador quake of 6.3 on 25th April 2025

 Here it is.

Prediction date 26th April 2025 ,predicted magnitude 6.9
Today ie 25th April 2025 there is a quake if 6.3 at 11.44 UTC at Ecuador
Watch the accuracy of prediction
The date predicted is 26th April (+ or - one day margin)
Not only this, watch my epicenter location hypothesis. The quake was just after Sunrise (  half an hour )
Please note that ,this is not enough as per my prediction. Though I count a hit only if it is a 6+ quake.
We are approaching almost the similar combination of planets, Sun and Moon ,as we had on date of Maymar quake of 7.7 (28th March 2025)
So ,expect few more 6+ ,even 6.5 + quake till 27th April 2025.
Pl note epicenter is not predicted, as prohibited by Indian Disaster Act 2025.
Disclaimer..My theory is not backed by any Organization or Institution. @USGS  has no time or mindset to look at the theory ,other than Plate tectonics. These quake may not occur

Afghanistan quake

watch accuracy of prediction 

Prediction for 18th April 25 (+ or -) one day

for major quakes (6 &+)

Today at local Noon ( 12 .17 IST) there is a 5.7 quake at Afghanistan/Pakistan 

Tremors felt at J&K ,New Delhi and NCR

WATCH ACCURACY OF EPICENTER HYPOTHESIS ALSO

Delhi dust strom and heavy rain

 Do you think this is normal?

Or

There is something, potent ,in the dates 10th /11th April 25?

Watch my hypothesis pertaining to general theory of tidal and Gravitational pull ,which apply to all 8 layers and produce different results 

1) Earth core...Change directions 

2) Deep quakes.. at 700 km + deapth 

3) Quakes...pull on upper crust

4) Volcanic eruptions...tidal pull on mouth of volcano 

5) Budging of upper crust

6) Hightides-low tides

7) Cloud brust...hightide effect on moist clouds 

8) Tropical cyclones..Low tides effect of atmosphere creates partial vacuum, when air moves to fill in this partial vacuum, and air passes over oceans having water temp 26 to 28 degrees Celsius, it geather latent heat of water and get momentum. 

thus creates a cyclone

Pakistan Earthquake

 As predicted date was 10/11th April 25 ( with + or - 1 day margin,  here are two major quakes

1) At PNG .6.2 at 5S ,153 E at 3.47 UTC

The is just after Local Noon 

2) At Pakistan ,5.2 at 7.30 UTC ,33 N,72.5 E.

Watch Sun is right at overhead at epicenter 

(67.5 E ie 5 degree longitudes margin)

Any Doubts U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)

Thunderstorm-is this normal?

 Flood ,lighting and thunderstorms in UP,BIHAR

Is this normal?
Predicted by #IMD ?
NO

Watch my universal theory of tidal pull and Gravitational pull effect on all 8 layers

10th is Predicted date

Here is a strong storm to claim more lives
Amit
Amit Dave
How can weather dept/IMD justify this

for more

https://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com

Questions to Mr Zhu Hongbin

 Here is a Question to Mr Zhu Hongbin

Recently on 20th March 2025 ,Mr Zhu zHongbin from Beijing Earthquake Agency have published an Article in Journal
Geodesy  and Geodynamics ,which was peer reviewed also.
It says
1) Due to change in Earth rotational speed ,ie length of day ,there will be more Earthquakes .
2) After studying dats for 150 years from 1879 ,he has concluded that this is the sixth major Earthquake phase
3) There are chances of 8+ quakes soon.
Now some questions to Mr Zhu Hongbin
A) The seismolist believes that the tidal pull of Moon is mainly responsible for Earth rotational speed change ,due to tidal effect of Moon on Earth
So, If the tidal pull of Moon can change the rotational speed of Earth ,there by causing stresses in plate tectonics  ,why it can not induce quakes?
If it can move or change the speed of Earth ,can it not shift plates or induce quake by pull on magma
The beauty of Seismology is it believes, Moon can change rotational speed of earth,which in turn induce stress in plates ,but Moon or tidal pull is not responsible for quakes .

Answer to USGS

 1l Earthquake in mornings and evening is not the only criteria.

For Sun....Mornings, NOON,Evening and midnight 

And for MOON it is time when Moon is rising,Setting ,overhead and opposite side of the globe

2) For Earthquakes...

If Tidal pull of Moon only is considered it iwill not give any result 

Tidal pull of Sun ,Moon ans all planets up to Saturn/Urenus to be counted 

Not only this ,the planets when change their direction from Direct to retrogate or vice e versa, it produces a jurk / imbalance in the molten magma. It is like applying a brake or acceleratior  to a car.

This rate of change of velocity changes the momentum of magma ,inducing a trigger 

3)Fast moving Moon is the trigger. When the situation is potent ,Joining ,Opposing or squaring these potent group induce a quake.

Magnitude depends on Proximity of Moon ,Sun and major planets and number of planets at Maximum Declinations

Why more 6+ quakes this month?

 why so many 6 + quakes this month?

watch concentration of several planets at a single point .

This figure shows planets position today ,right now

Now on 10th April Moon will oppose all these planets and will also be square to Jupiter, there are fair chances of 6.5+ quakes ( several) to occur

Disclaimer..Epicenter not predicted 

However may follow my epicenter hypothesis

6.9 quake at PNG a date hit prediction

 Any one have doubts?

Wake up #USGS
Yet another date hit ,6.5+ earthquake on 4th April 2025 at 20 at 20.04 UTC at
PNG ,Papa na Guena
Epicenter at 6 S ,152 E
Prediction date is 5th April 25 with + or - one day margin.
Not only this ,watch accuracy of epicenter hypothesis
The Sun is Rising Sharply at epicenter and
MOON at 31 West ( at Nadir 3 degree margin)
For more pl see
https://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com

Nepal Earthquake, 5.0 on 4th April 25

 Watch out

Though not 6+ ,but significant quake of 5.0 at Nepal just now

at 14.22 UTC ,and epicenter at 29 N 82 E

Tremors felt in New Deli and NCR 

Prediction 5th April 2025 ,with + or - 1 one day margin

Maymar quake prediction

 Disclaimer.

The quakes mentioned here may not occur and that ,my theory is not backed by any institute or university
There are chances of quakes (6+) occuring on 5th and 10th April 2025
Earlier I have mentioned the dates 10th and 26th for Japan region
Here I will be giving probable time for
Maymar
Date 5th April 2025.Time in UTC(+ or - 45 minutes)
1)00.10 hrs
2)05.10
3)13.15
4)19.00

Date 10th April 25 time in UTC (+ or - 45 minutes)
1)05.00 hr
2)12.00 hr
3)16.30 hr
4)22.30 hr

Some questions to plate tectonics

 Some how I am not convinced with reasons given by plate tectonics

Some of the questions not answered by plate tectonics are
1) Why there are several major (6+) quakes on a given dates spread all over the globe. Are some dates more prone to major quakes?
2) Why there are several 6+ quakes on short span at some locations like Tonga ,Japan etc.
3) Why deep quakes at more than 700 kms ? Plate thickness is 100 to 150 kms?
Subduction residue reason given is wrong
4) why so many less random 3 quakes? Is that really of built up stress? So frequently?

Yes
There are plates and they are moving but..
My version is....

Plates are due to Quakes and that the quakes are not due to plates...
Initially there was one single plate -Pengea-super continent , situated at equator ( so stable-not moving)
Due to violent quakes it broke in pieces and due to Coriolis effect ,the land masses started to drift...
1) in Northern hemisphere towards North East
2) In southern hemisphere towards South west
All land mass will ultimately go to both poles ,slowly
And there will be no another super continent as expected by scientists
Once land mass moved away from Equator will never return to equator, as shown by scientist
The proof is..
We have very less land mass at equator and huge land masses at both poles

One more date hit and epicenter location hypothesis, hit prediction

 Wake up #USGS

Here is one more 6.5+ hit prediction
Today a  6.8 quake at mid Atlantic ridge.
At 14.09 UTC at 52 N ,32 W
Watch
Prediction date 2nd April 25 ,with + or - 1 day margin
Not only this ,watch accuracy of my epicenter hypothesis. The Sun is at Zenith ,( overhead) at Local NOON.Sun is at 31.5 W ,right overhead.
For new comers,the epicenter location hypothesis says
The epicenter of major Earthquake will be at location where

1) The Sun or Moon are at Zemith or Nadir
Overhead or other side of thr globe ( for Sun at Noon or midnight ( with 15 degree longitudes margin)

Or
2) The Sun or Moon is rising or setting with 45 minutes margin

One more date hit prediction

 Yet another 6.2 quake at Japan today

A date hit as well as magnitude hit prediction 

not only this ,watch my epicenter hypothesis 

At the time of quake Moon is setting ,sharply at epicenter 

31 N and 131 E

General theory of tidal and Gravitational pull acting at all 8 layers

 Watch out

Today ie 2nd April 2025 , a date predicted for 6.3 quake on my blog and linked in ( with + or - 1 day margin, there is 6.3 quake at P.A Ridge.Not only this there is fresh Volcanic eruption at Iceland volcano ,first time after 800 years.
https://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com
My Gereral theory of tidal pull says..
The tidal pull ( coupled with Gravitational pull )is applicable at all levels starting from Earth's inner core to Atmosphere..causing
1) The change in direction of rotation of Earth's inner core
AfterEvery 60 yers major planets acquires same potent position
2) Deep quakes at depth more than 600 km ,due to tidal pull on inner solid layer over liquid magma, which breaks and induce deeper quakes

3) Volcanic eruptions .
The tidal pull on magma below Earth crust ,when exceeds ,it break open the mouth of volcano and hence eruptions
4) Earthquakes on upper crust ,up to 300 kms.
Earthquakes occurs due to combined effects of tidal pull on magma ,Gravitational pull on upper crust, and jerks due to change in direction of planets
5) Hightides and low tides in oceans
6) Bulging of upper crust
6) Cloud bursts
This is due to high tidal pull collecting moist clouds at one location
7)  cyclones over oceans
This is due to low tide effects on Atmosphere, creating partial vacuum. The air rushing in to fill this partial vacuum if pass over ocean with water temperature 26 to 28 degrees Celsius, it geather latent heat of water and get momentum 

6.3 quake at P.A Ridge .A date hit prediction

 Watch 

One more date hit 6+ quake prediction 

A 6.3 quake at P.A .Ridge today 2nd April 2025 at 00.29 UTC 

Epicenter 57 S ,142 W

Now check my prediction on LinkedIn and my blog

https://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com

A date hit prediction 

Check my epicenter hypothesis 

Moon is at Zenith at epicenter ( 5 degrees long margin)

Earth Inner core reverse movement-A hypothesis

 Recently it was published by media that ,scientists have noticed that the Earth inner core has started moving in the reverse direction.

It is also mentioned that ,such reversal happen after  roughly evet 70 years

Now here is my hypothesis

All solar system planets occupy the same relative  position after about every 64 to 65 years.
So ,when they occupy another ,same,potent position,  after roughly 65 years, the tidal and Gravitational pull become excessive ,and it pull the inner core in the opposite direction.

Now here is calculations

The orbital time of planets are as follows
1) Mercury..0.25 Earth year
2)Venus....0.6 year
3)Earth ..1 year
4)Mars...1.88 years
5)Jupiter...12 years
6) Saturn.. 29.4  Years
7) Urenus..84  years
8)Neptune...165 years

Now here is my hypothesis
The Earth's inner core change the direction
of rotation after every 60 yeaes ,as aginst approximate 70 years mentioned by scientist.

Now look at this  calculations
Between 60 Earth years how many complete full orbital rounds the planets make
1) Mercury...240 rounds x 0.25 =60 years
2)Venus...100 roundsx0.6 = 60 years
3)Earth   ...60 rounds  ×1 = 60years
4) Mars .32 rounds ×1.88 =60.16years
5) Jupiter ..5 rounds× 12= 60 years
6)Saturn..2 rounds×29.4 Years =58.8yeers

Thus there is a surge in tidal and Gravitational pull after evey 60 years ,just after that ,the Earth's inner core start moving in reverse direction
The extended hypothesis says ...
The major and violent direction change of Earth inner core occurs after evey 170 to 180 years as Urenus and Neptune are also counted
7) Urenus..  84 years×2 round =168 years
8) Neptune.  165 years  ..one round
FirAll other plates 60×3=180 years.

Wake up USGS. Wake up JAPAN

 Wake up USGS

Is this a coincidence?
Two 7+ quakes and several 6+ quakes on given predicted date ( with one day margin)
Can plate tectonics justify these quakes on and around one date?
Are some dates potent?
How can stresses on various plates, not connected in any way ,release on one day
Think out of the box
How plate tectonics can help humanity ,if it believes that major quakes can not be predicted
Two 7+ quakes
First a 7.7 at Maymar on 28th March 25
Second 7.1  at Tonga today 30th Mar h 25

The predicted date is 29th March (+ or - one day margin)
Not only thus there are several 6 and 6.5+ quakes on these  days
Both major quakes follow my epicenter location hypothesis.
for more check
https://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com

Aftershocks at Maymar

 Here it is

A 4.5 magnitude aftershock at Maymar just before local midnight (30 minutes margin)

Watch today local NOON time also

Major (6+) aftershock hypothesis

 Here is my Aftershock hypothesis

Once a 7 + quake occur at a location, there are fair chances of 6+ aftershock to occur after following time intervals
Time margin is + or - 45 minutes
1) Within first hour
2) After 12 hrs
3)After 24 hrs
4) 7th /8th day
5) 14th/15th day
6) After one Lunar month
This is because after these time intervals, the Moon occupy another potent position, for that epicenter
Say
After
a)12 hrs the epicenter moves exactly 180 degree ie other side of the globe.
Say in the case of Maymar ,it will be midnight at epicenter
b) after 24 hrs ,the epicenter cones again under potent pull
However, after second day ,the Moon moves away ,dispersing the potency ,(as Moon moves fast - 1 degree every 2 hrs)
C) After 7th/8th day Moon occupying the position 90 degree apart ( yet another potent position)
D) After 14th /15th day Moon occupy positio exactly 180 apart ,so from Joing to opposing-yet another potent position
E) By the end of one Lunar Month 28/29 days ,the potency slowly fades away.
(This is because other slow moving planets and Sun moves away)
By the way Sun moves 1 degree per day
So watch following dates for 6+ aftershock
1) 29th March 2025
2) 4th April 2025
3)10/11th April 2025
4) 25/26th April  2025
The time to remain alert is local NOON and
Local midnight ,with + or - 45 minutes margin

7.7 quake at Maymar, 28th March 25

 Oh no

A major hit prediction 

A 7.7 Earthquake occured at Maymar just now ie on 28th Msrch 2025 at 6.20 UTC ,at epicenter 22 N ,96 E
A hit prediction
Predicted date 29th March with + or - one day margin
Not only this watch my epicenter hypothesis
The Sun was st 86 E at the time of quake
( 10 degree longitudes margin or 40 minutes past Local Noon)
Mayman is 6.30 hrs ahead of UTC or
1 hr ahead of Indian Standered Time
6.20  UTC +6.30 ie 12 .50 hrs NOON local time. ie just after NOON 

Earthquake prediction for April 2025

 Here are some potent dates for major (6+) earthquakes or Volcanic eruptions, for the month of April 25

Two three important points fir tge month are
1) on 10th the planets like Venus ,Mercury, Saturn and  Neptune are joining and Moon will oppose them all
2) Venus is closer and changing directions from retrogate to Direct on 13th
3) Mercury is also also changing directions on 7th
4) Two dates are most potent
10th & 26th
Now the probable dates are
A) 2nd April 25.....6.3 magnitude
B)5th April 25......6.5 magnitude 26th
B) 10th/11th  April 25.......6.8 magnitude
C)18th April 25.......6.4 magnitude
D)26th April 25......6.9 magnitude
The time margin is + or - 1 day
The magnitude margin is + or - 0.3

Two dates ie 10th and 26th are most potent.
There are chances that a fresh  Volcanic eruptions may be observed on these two dates.

7.0 QUAKE AT NZ ,A DATE HIT PREDICTION

 Here it is

A 7.0 magnitude Earthquake at New Zealand on 25th at 1.40 UTC at
47S ,166 E
Prediction date 24th March 2025 with + or - 12 hrs margin
A date hit prediction

Not only this watch my epicenter hypothesis.
The Sun is Overhead ( 40 minutes margin)
The is at 157 E at the time of quake
( 9 degrees longitudes margin)

Any Doubt about Earthquake theory or
epicenter location hypothesis?

14th March 25 ,a date hit ,6+ quake prediction

 

Yet another ,6+, date hit Earthquake prediction
Date 14th March 2025
Magnitude 6
Epicenter-South Sandwitch Island
55.7S,27 W
Time 23.40 UTC
Wakeup #USGS
For more
https://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com

A dare hit predictìn at Padam - India

 

Watch out
a date hit Earthquake prediction
A 5.1 Quake near Kagil(Padam ) tidsy ie 14th March 25 at 2.30 am IST

For more see
https://lnkd.in/dzRtvB6w

Japan quake - A date hit on 8th March 25

 

Yest another date hit major quake on 8th March 25
A major quake of 5.9(6?) at Japan at 23.at 23.42 UTC
Epicenter at 28.7N,130.3 E

Not only this ,watch may epicenter location hypothesis
The Moon at the time of quake was at
53 W ie at Nadir ( opposite side of globe)
180-130 = 50 W ( only 3 degree longitudes margin)
#IRAN
#USGS
#JAPAN
#INDIA
#AUSTRALIA
#UK
#SEISMOLOGY

Nepal quake,A date hit prediction for 8th March 25

 

Yet another date hit Earthquake Prediction
A 5.2 quake in Nepal to day ie 8th March 25
at 8.50 UTC
Also felt in part of Bihar
Watch the accuracy
for more pl see
https://lnkd.in/dzRtvB6w

4.5 Earthquake at Washington on 3rd March 2025

 A date hit and Epicenter hit prediction

4.5 Earthquake at Washington today
A date hit prediction
Watch the epicenter hypothesis
The quake was just before Sun rise at local time

Basics of my Earthquake prediction theiry

 

Some explation on what I have mentioned above
My Theory is based on the idea of...reason of Earthquake is not plate tectonics  but
a combined /resultant force of
1) Tidal pull on semisolid magma by planetary pull ( including Sun and Moon)
2) Gravitational pull by Sun and Moon on upper Earthcrust
3) Force due to sudden change in direction of tidal pull ,due to change in motion by planets.
It us like breaking force ,or Sudden acceleration on magma
Magnitude depends on alignment ,aspects and proximity of Sun ,Moon  and Planets
Epicenter is decided by hypothesis, discussed earlier

March 2025 prediction

 Here are the probable dates for major (6+) quakes and Volcanic eruptions for the Month of March 2025

Before giving the dates few points which can be potential for major quakes this month
1) Moon is at ,one of the rarest maximum declinatiins ,both North and South
Maximum Declination North is 28.37 on 8th March and 28.40 degrees South on 22nd March 2025. Moon reach 28.5 degrees maximum Declination once in 18.6 Years.
This gives one more hypothesis.
Every 18th/19th year we may get spike in major Earthquakes (6+).
All are invited to cross check this hypothesis also ( in addition to my Epicenter location hypothesis)
2) Venus is becoming stationary  on 2nd March and will start its retrogate motion on 4th March 25.
3) Mars will go Direct on 1st March 2025.

Thus the probable dates are
1)2nd/3rd March 2025
2)8th March
3)14th March
4)22nd March
5)25th March
6) 29th March 2025.
Dates and time as per UTC.
Location of Epicenter are as per hypothesis.
For more pl visit
https://earthquake-prediction.blogspot.com